Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore

Create an account  

 
Epic 49 - Domination Dilemma - Info Thread

Hi,

since my name was mentioned I might as well offer my 0.2 gold on this issue... wink

microbe Wrote:Are you saying I'm not even allowed to download the save and play it if I do not do whatever rules you specify
Was that meant to be a serious question? Of course you are allowed to.

I have to agree with Sirian about posting reports violating the rules. "Participating in a tournament" for me means not just downloading and playing the game. That alone is just watching the tournament, not participating in it. For me, I only become a participant of the tournament once I've decided to post a report about my game, to submit my entry to be reviewed and scored by the sponsor and the community.

So you're fine if you download Epic games and play them any way you want, freely bending or ignoring the rules to ease the challenge, to explore different situations or for whatever reason you may have. I guess (even hope) there are lurkers out there doing just that (and in fact, I'd like to see any statistics Gris/KoP have on Epic game downloads). Fun is where you find it, to borrow a phrase from an RBer from a different forum. smile

Once you've decided that you want to submit your game, though, you have to obey to the rules. Normally, in other tournaments of any kind, entries are submitted to the organizers, reviewed by them, and only valid entries get scored/published. Here, the part of reviewing the entries before publishing them is skipped, so it would be nice for the community to respect all the rules by themselves from the start.

We always were a community of like-minded players where no strong regulation or rule enforcement was needed. In fact, I don't think this whole tournament would have lasted longer than a couple of games if Sirian would have been forced to invest even more energy with constantly having to regulate others.


More often than not, people only realize late in a game that they have made a mistake and accidentally broken a rule, and just post a shadow report about it. That's okay in my mind. But if people started to post reports of games where they willingly ignored the rules, the whole tournament would erode. Other people (newcomers, or even old-timers) would ask themselves, why not do the same - they didn't like rule X anyway. That's a very slippery slope.

Quote:Just take Epic48 as an example, Kylearan played the game in completely different variant rules,
No, I did not. The original rules were still in effect for me, I only expanded on them. There's a difference between breaking the rules and adding more. You're not allowed to participate in the Tour de France with a motorcyclye; however, nobody prevents you from participating on a normal bike with your right arm tied behind you back.

-Kylearan
There are two kinds of fools. One says, "This is old, and therefore good." And one says, "This is new, and therefore better." - John Brunner, The Shockwave Rider
Reply

Quote:Other people (newcomers, or even old-timers) would ask themselves, why not do the same - they didn't like rule X anyway. That's a very slippery slope.

Valid point. You do not want any reports posted in this forum to sidetrack people even if they are clearly marked "warning! mapstat used. Not for tournament." And Sirian will "crack me down" if I do that.

Quote:No, I did not. The original rules were still in effect for me, I only expanded on them. There's a difference between breaking the rules and adding more.

Is there really such a big difference? You give yourself more restrictions while still participating in the tournament. It's still unfair. Not just unfair to yourself, it's also unfair to others. "I got a higher score than this guy but he put more restrictions for himself (with hard to measure effect). It makes me feel bad because it seems my higher score means little." If everyone should start to tie his arm behind his back, it would make the tournament meaningless as well.

I think the reason that you choose to expand the rules and that I choose to use mapstat is exactly the same: focus on having fun and sharing the experience instead of the tournament. Yet one is allowed and the other is forbidden.

Anyway, I don't intend to argue more. If it's the deal, I'm sorry for my misunderstanding of the epic culture and will just stop playing epics and see how things go when civ4 comes out.
Reply

Sirian Wrote:Right.

Third party tools are a sticky situation. Regulating them consumes resources we just don't have on hand here. The simplest, best, and fairest answer is to rule them all out.

If they are more important to you than the competition, then you're better off playing solo anyway. The whole point of competition is comparison, but where these tools lend advantages to those who use them, the conditions of the competition are no longer level for those who don't use them.

This issue is not open to debate. Third party tools won't be allowed for Civ4 Epics, either. Here's hoping they won't be needed!


- Sirian
That's clear. No "third party tools".

I just asked because Mapstat was singled out and I wanted to be sure for myself that I understood the spirit of the rules as you were seeing them. Not to (re)start a discussion about it.
Reply

Sirian Wrote:This issue was put before the RBCiv community and the options were debated. This is the rule that we reached. It was a community decision and the debate is closed.


I fully support Sirian on this one.

This is the reason I dropped the Civ Fanatics GOTM for the long time. I didn't like the way it was run. I didn't try to chance the rules, as I knew Cracker wouldn't bend. I simply dropped it.



Sirian Wrote:In the mean time, there are four choices.
...
C. Don't play the Epics.
...
D. You can play something besides Civ3. I burnt out on it in January 2003 and have only played exploratory variant games since. There are other fun games out there! (Seriously!)


That was why I made the comment about MapStat. I have already chosen option C. I just wanted it known that you were losing a player because of the MapStat rule.

I have been doing Option D more. I have been increasing my A&A type gaming again, playing games such as World at War, Rail Tycoon 3, etc.

Reply

The rules state: Scenario Concept: The world MUST be in your hands, no matter what it takes!

The victory condition states: Victory: Domination

Am I correct in interpreting this that a Domination victory, while there are still other civs around is not a complete victory ? That you need to win by Domination as well as conquest simultaniouesly ? Or is Conquest-victory enabled?
Reply

Domination is the victory condition to pursue. Get there as fast as you can.
Fortune favors the bold.
Reply

microbe Wrote:* comparing my game with others on a strategic level, where the difference of mapstat could be ignored

In fact it can't be ignored on a strategic level. It is an important strategic decision how often you look at the F4 screen for example. At least I do it only every 10 or so turns unless I'm waiting for a very specific trade opportunity. This is one (and not the only one) example of a strategic level where mapstat does make a difference.
Reply

Urugharakh Wrote:At least I do it only every 10 or so turns unless I'm waiting for a very specific trade opportunity. This is one (and not the only one) example of a strategic level where mapstat does make a difference.
I agree here. My checks for possible trading is much more frequent since I started using mapstat. If nothing else mapstat results in catching a lot more purchased workers after the 1000BC date is achieved. If you gain 4 or 5 more free workers vs. every one else that is a big help. smile


We are beating a dead horse on this on. Mapstat gives you and advantage - period. whip

And remember I defending no map stat even though it create a situation where I *DON'T* want to play because of it.
Reply

Hi,

game complete. Didn't see any dilemma (as I understand the word), but it was a fun game nonetheless. smile

I hope Civ 4 will introduce a better mechanism than 'domination' for recognizing one player is in a winning position. Don't know how, but shortening the mop-up phase would be a Good Thing...

-Kylearan
There are two kinds of fools. One says, "This is old, and therefore good." And one says, "This is new, and therefore better." - John Brunner, The Shockwave Rider
Reply

Game finished.

Nice game, thank you to the Sponsor.
Reply



Forum Jump: