February 15th, 2016, 12:49
Posts: 3,898
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2013
I logged in and unpaused, and scooter and mack agreed peace.
According to the diplo screen, Tsargon is at war with mack, and there are no other wars currently ongoing. So I think we can go Tsargon in the first slot of the turn, mack in the second.
Mack appeared to be afk so I repaused(only 2hr something on the clock).
Hopefully can play my turn later this evening.
February 15th, 2016, 12:51
Posts: 3,978
Threads: 31
Joined: Feb 2010
(February 15th, 2016, 12:28)Dreylin Wrote: (February 15th, 2016, 01:45)Tsargon Wrote: I took my turn this afternoon, seeing as I'm not at war with anyone I'm unsure as to my place in any turn order
(February 15th, 2016, 12:11)mackoti Wrote: can someone unpause?I am at war wth tsargon so i dont know how we deal with this.So would be tsargon first and after we?
I sense some confusion in the Force...
well i am in game and i am at war.
February 15th, 2016, 12:54
(This post was last modified: February 15th, 2016, 12:55 by scooter.)
Posts: 15,377
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
Yeah, can someone explain the Tsargon/Mack peace/war thing? I'm really confused by it. I've seen this sequence in this order:
1) Joey says in this thread that he declared on Tsargon to lock in a turn order.
2) I login, and I see this war in the event log, but I view the foreign relations screen, and it shows me no war between Tsargon and Mack. Unless my brain just glitched out on me and it really was there. Anyway I'm left thinking that war has been peace'd away even though I don't remember seeing peace in the event log.
3) Mack logs in, comes in here and implies he's still at war with Tsargon.
4) Tsargon comes in here, says he's not at war with anyone.
5) Mack returns here, says again he's at war with Tsargon, and then Black Sword confirms it.
Are we all just going crazy or what's going on here? 
edit: crossposted with Mackoti. Seems the most likely explanation is that I somehow missed the other red line on the foreign relations screen, and Tsargon was simply mistaken.
February 15th, 2016, 16:49
(This post was last modified: February 15th, 2016, 16:49 by scooter.)
Posts: 15,377
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
I see TBS is in, which makes me last. I'll be available to play to finally roll this turn sometime in the next 5 hours or so. Sounds like I am now at peace with everyone. I'm OK to play again for the next turn before the evening is over, right? Just wanted to make 100% certain that there aren't any other turn split things I'm unaware of before I revert to peace mode play-as-you-can without worrying about double-moves.
February 15th, 2016, 16:59
Posts: 3,898
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2013
Paused with 1.30 on the clock. Scooter, I think you're good to play back to back turns(assuming they're peaceful of course).
February 15th, 2016, 17:46
Posts: 15,377
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
Didn't forget to end turn, just wasn't able to finish it just yet, so I paused and logged out. Should be able to finish in a couple hours.
February 16th, 2016, 16:00
Posts: 2,744
Threads: 18
Joined: Feb 2013
We'll be coming down to the wire, but don't need a pause for this turn.
February 16th, 2016, 20:16
Posts: 2,744
Threads: 18
Joined: Feb 2013
paused for borsche with ~2 hours left
February 18th, 2016, 11:43
(This post was last modified: February 18th, 2016, 11:43 by scooter.)
Posts: 15,377
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
I think I may have broken a rule? I sent a silly trade offer to someone yesterday that was clearly intended to be some sort of diplo (although I doubt it's 100% clear what I was communicating), but it looks like in the first post this is forbidden.
Quote:Real trades offers only.
Do I understand this right that a generic meaningless trade offer would be against the rules?
If so, really sorry about that. Didn't realize that was the rules for this game. I realized this morning I never checked to see what the diplo rules were. I see another rule I haven't played with before:
Quote:You may not trade cities with other players
This means a city may not change hands for any reason other than military capture or culture flip, correct?
February 18th, 2016, 13:37
Posts: 3,898
Threads: 26
Joined: Apr 2013
Quote:Do I understand this right that a generic meaningless trade offer would be against the rules?
Yep.
FYI, I paused the game for myself. I have football now, will finish in a few hours.
|
