Werewolf 3 Game Thread

[fire&ice]

great the one player i thought was a villager ended up being killed. Although I am happy he is not who I thought he was in the end. If I had been around I would have switched to try and save him. I thought he was the fool/seer from his conversation about the seer fool results. Weed on my part I guess.

[Bobchillingworth]

great the one player i thought was a villager ended up being killed. Although I am happy he is not who I thought he was in the end. If I had been around I would have switched to try and save him. I thought he was the fool/seer from his conversation about the seer fool results. Weed on my part I guess.

Wait, so what you're saying is that you were intentionally voting to lynch the player you suspected had a 50% chance of being the seer? You say you would have switched your vote in the end, but why didn't you switch immediately after you read his post about the the seer/fool, if that post is what made you conclude that he was playing for Team Village?



My own thoughts on the lynch: Opps, shrug. That's the extent of my mourning for MJW- we were likely to kill a villager anyway, and we didn't have more dirt on anyone else. MJW is a polarizing player, and Irgy was spot-on in his explanation of why keeping MJW around would hurt us in future lynching rounds. Just his mere existence dominated the day, complete with an utterly bizarre discussion about lung cancer and dementia. We didn't need that kind of crap cluttering the one avenue we have to share analysis and info. Future lynchings of players on the grounds that they suck should be kept to a minimum though =)

[fire&ice]

I wasn't in around the end Also wasn't I voting for Lewwyn?

[Bobchillingworth]

Ah, my apologies. I read your post as saying that you were thinking of saving MJW by switching off him at the end. I should probably pay more attention to the actual voting record

[Irgy]

Well, for all that my biggest arguments for lynching MJW centered around the case where he was indeed a villager, it still sucks to have lynched a villager. However, we at least got some information out of the day. The significance of which will not truely be understood until later when we have some more roles known.

At least we can move on and look forward to an interesting day 2. I'd propose raising new candidates tomorrow to spread us out a little, the worst thing we could do is focus on the same group of people all the time only to discover they're all villagers and the wolves have just been having a field day. We can come back to people from today with increased information later on.

I wonder about that. In WW2 wolves (Irgy & Selrahc) had no problem to lynch sandover

By the end of that day I couldn't not vote for Sandover. He was obviously a wolf even without me knowing it already Not from anything Roland said mind you, but from the counter claim and MJW's dirty metagaming.

[Cull]

So timing of my posts: I can say this is suspicious to be sure. Not really sure how I can convince anybody that it was coincidence.

The two arguments against me is that I don't post enough/have enough ideas to stay as a villager, and that I vote on the bandwagons. There is also the idea that Lewwyn and myself have a connection, which I believe is founded on the notion that he either voted to

a)lynch MJW, which I think over 80% of the villager at some time believed was #1 lynch or believe to be ww(no not Warwick, werewolf D: )
b)save me, meaning than either I'm a villager, and he's a wolf using some super plot, I'm a villager, he's a villager convince of my innocence, or I'm a wolf and he's a villager fooled by my pm(oh waitttt).

Its a gambit for the villagers, otherwise but I think that lynching either me or Lewwyn next is best unless something pops up to prove that either we have a confirmed innocent, or that we get a wolf out of it.

For the former point, quite frankly(that I don't post enough/have enough ideas to stay as a villager/in the game), I have a regional, then state competition I am going for something at school, which I for real thought I wasn't going to go for. I will probably get a lot more time after regionals though, since I will probably only be doing a little at State. As for ideas, in WW1, I didn't post nearly at all. Did that mean I was a shy wolfie? Nah just a quite villager. If anything if I was a wolf, I would play more agg to paint the picture of someone relatively unexperienced who is trying to portray as a villager. As for not having enough ideas, at the time of my first two posts, quite frankly, there WAS no concrete evidence but to go on gut feeling, or instinct, or just to do a loliplaceholder vote like the very first few. After my intial gut feeling, I stayed on mjw because there was nobody else I suspected as much. TBH, Lewwyn as well as Roland went through my mind.

Now what I said above can be applied to other people who seem to be going by, for ex Roland.

Roland is using the excuse that he is playing it safe, not getting too into this game, which I'm fine with. But for someone to go from his posting in ww2, to what I see now if frankly ridiculous imo. Replace the regional/state competitions for me with his "I don't want to get burned out" thing he is using(which while might be true is a bit more skeptical of tbh if the interwebz in general is anything to go by(which it prob isn't for rb)), and have him voting on basically inconsequential votes(his vote on Lewwyn never gained storm, he never petitioned hard on it, his vote on me was before the main stream of votes came) so he's either

a)for real a quiet villager reforming
or
b)a really smart wolf who is using both his last game as well as working with other wolves to gain storm.

Another gambit lynch, one that I'm not even 50% sure about on b.

Not only that, Bob is playing remarkably similar to WW1. Maybe thats his general posting style(which I think it is), but theres some fearmongering for thought(since you know I have to post original ideas now)

And then numerous others who have posted as inconsequential as I did/do, or with nothing/follow the crows votes. So what does pb, the man so WELL versed in deception think of this?

[Cull]

Well I'm not going to get anywhere with novice today so may as well switch. In my opinion, Cull would almost certainly play passively as a wolf, and PB is certainly comfortable with deception and therefore might play actively. This doesn't prove that PB is a villager, but it makes Cull a better target if we're going to lynch someone based on being inactive.

Wait what? I've played pretty active in a wolf in many a mini mafia games I played on CFC. I have about 20+ mafia games since last summer played, the majority of which were very small, fast paced games. Pretty well versed in deception

[novice]

Okay, everybody who's good at deception, raise their hands.

[Cull]

Hand raised.

[Roland]

Its a gambit for the villagers, otherwise but I think that lynching either me or Lewwyn next is best unless something pops up to prove that either we have a confirmed innocent, or that we get a wolf out of it.

Frankly, I don't see how finding one of you as either guilty or innocent condemns nor exonerates the other. Further, I'm not inclined to lynch either of you - I don't see any gain.

Roland is using the excuse that he is playing it safe, not getting too into this game, which I'm fine with. But for someone to go from his posting in ww2, to what I see now if frankly ridiculous imo. Replace the regional/state competitions for me with his "I don't want to get burned out" thing he is using(which while might be true is a bit more skeptical of tbh if the interwebz in general is anything to go by(which it prob isn't for rb)), and have him voting on basically inconsequential votes(his vote on Lewwyn never gained storm, he never petitioned hard on it, his vote on me was before the main stream of votes came) so he's either

a)for real a quiet villager reforming
or
b)a really smart wolf who is using both his last game as well as working with other wolves to gain storm.

Another gambit lynch, one that I'm not even 50% sure about on b.

Seriously, if we're going to have this arbitrary albatross slung around my neck for the rest of the game I'd just as soon clear it up right now. It's distracting, it's a weak argument, and we all have better things to do than speculate on my behavior. For that matter, I nominate myself as the lynch target for tomorrow - over you AND Lewwyn. I'm not going to vote for myself out of the gate - I'll leave that to the rest of you - but I want to get the discussion started, because I really am tired of reading it over and over.

If you think I'm a 'Wolf, by all means vote me off now. You'll find I'm going to be playing the same game this time around as I did last time, just not quite so much in the spotlight (excluding right now, of course - hopefully this will be the last time). I'm very much a Villager, I'm very much looking to win this thing, and I'm very much hoping to live until the end. I'm not, however, in favor of having my "behavior" questioned in comparison to my last game, especially when joining this was literally a last-minute decision on a whim to try and have a more enjoyable, light-hearted experience in WW. I had a great deal of fun in the last round, but it was also taxing in some respects, so I'm hoping to capitalize and expand upon the former while avoiding the latter.

Consider this my attempt at getting some discussion going, and putting to rest fickle doubts before it becomes too onerous.