(January 19th, 2014, 13:01)Rowain Wrote: (January 19th, 2014, 10:33)Serdoa Wrote: And trying to already now limit the lynch-options to 3 players (and ignoring one that several people voiced suspicion, also for his behaviour after the lynch) is not making me believe in you Rowain.
First things first. And those 3 are the top suspects. I see little value to go around and talk a lot about people who are suspicious but not that much as those 3. That's a good thing for later hunting. (and yes there are some more)
Please explain why they are the top suspects Rowain. It seems for me they are in your mind the top suspects because they
a) did not vote for Azza and
b) voted for Q
I already gave an explanation for this and if you argue that we should have voted Azza I can point to 11 other players you should question as well. I personally have a hard time seeing how it makes a difference if someone stuck all the time to his lone vote on someone who'd never get lynched or if he instead moved it to someone else who was in the running. Again, the only argument here is that the vote was moved to the "wrong" player, which isn't even certain by now that this player is not scum as well.
Don't get me wrong, I agree if someone isn't showing his villagerness tomorrow he should be up for lynch. But I hardly see how that has to specifically applied to 3 players you singled out for basically a non-reason. And that's why I think that you yourself are suspicious. To remind you, what you wrote was
"For me Gazglum, Serdoa and Old Harry (the last 3 Qg voters) have to really show their villagerness tomorrow. And we should lynch one of those 3."
That's not at all taking anything else into account, nor did you give a reason for why we 3 are the top suspects. I think you just try to stir the lynch in a certain direction that does not have much to do with actually hunting wolves but more with preventing anyone looking anywhere else.
Also in the same post the quote from above is you wrote:
"I find it interesting to see how the Qgqqqqq wagon started to roll as soon Azza took the lead but didn't move an inch when I was voting him previously."
Obviously you believe that Q is a villager and some wolves tried to save their buddy Azza by voting him up. But if that is what you believe, what's up with this part I quoted? Why do you point out that no one voted Q when you did but then did later? Later there was actually a reason given to vote for him, while you just posted his name in red. So that's already explained there. But thinking it further through, if you believe that Q is a villager, why should the wolves not have voted for him earlier? There is no connection between it not gaining traction earlier and gaining traction later. Except as I pointed out your lack of reasoning.
(January 19th, 2014, 10:33)Serdoa Wrote: Also, why is it strange to talk a possibility of two scum on the line? If your Q-vote didn't gain traction till later it might as well be that scum didn't want to push neither him nor Azza and that both only gained traction when villagers being on 1-vote players moved from them because it got late and made no sense to stay on them.
Because catwalk was already sitting on 3 votes. and the Qg flurry began 8 minutes before Dl with Gazglum, you and Old Harry making the run. Interesting thing is that first you and then OH tied the race.
And I must say that I like your vote the least. First you voted Bob (who was on Azza together with MJW) then you tried to save Azza with your Qg run.[/quote]
And what has catwalk to do with that? I don't see anything that makes me believe that he is scum. So far he has played exactly as I'm used to from him. Why should I vote for him? And the same is btw true for Azza. I actually did believe that he was his normal self. So, I go for the one I believe is a wolf.
Also, what's exactly so interesting in us tieing the race? Not that I was even aware of it because the tallies were screwed up all the time. But lets presume I knew, what is interesting about that? What is the point you want to make? Because for me it surely looks like you actually don't have a point to make but just mention what happened in a tone that implicates importance without mentioning it.
The same is true for your last sentence: Again, what you do is just telling everyone what happened. Something we all can easily see. That's like saying "He ate ... at the cantina.". And? What's the point? I did eat at the cantina. And it was good. Yes they have mice - but on a stick they are actually quite delicious.