As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer
Create an account  
Realms Beyond Forum     Gaming     Civ Game Reporting     Completed Games     Completed Civ 4 Pitboss     Pitboss 16     RBP16 IT and Confession Thread

 
RBP16 IT and Confession Thread

#411
March 4th, 2014, 17:47
bantams Away
Regular User
Posts: 29
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2013
GG sorry but seriously hes an ass ive retired
Website Find
Reply

#412
March 4th, 2014, 17:58
Gavagai Offline
Regular User
Posts: 4,671
Threads: 36
Joined: Feb 2013
Bantams double-moved me and then converted himself to AI. Ichabod and any other lurker can find details in my thread. I paused the game until we figure out what we should do with this mess.
Find
Reply

#413
March 4th, 2014, 18:01 (This post was last modified: March 4th, 2014, 18:01 by Dhalphir.)
Dhalphir Offline
Regular User
Posts: 1,574
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2013
Just so you know bantams, you basically ruin your chances of ever playing any other game on RB if you act like this here. I know I wouldn't play with you again. Think carefully.
mackoti Wrote:SO GAVAGAI WINNED ALOT BUT HE DIDNT HAD ANY PROBLEM?
Find
Reply

#414
March 4th, 2014, 18:06
SevenSpirits Offline
Optimist
Posts: 7,766
Threads: 94
Joined: Oct 2009
I don't have any firsthand knowledge of the situation but from what I can tell, replacing bantams with an AI is pure improvement for the game. But I am fine with you and lurkers figuring out a good course of action. If we do leave him as AI, I suggest disallowing trading for his gold, GPT, or cities.
Tides of War mod • Torusland map script • Mirrorland map script
Find
Reply

#415
March 4th, 2014, 18:20
Gavagai Offline
Regular User
Posts: 4,671
Threads: 36
Joined: Feb 2013
Replacing Bantams with an AI should involve someone logging in and deleting units which double-moved me. I certainly don't want to lose C2 Formation HA because of that.
Find
Reply

#416
March 4th, 2014, 18:51
Ichabod Offline
Member
Posts: 9,706
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2010
Just got informed of the situation, I haven't read everything about it yet. Please, whoever can log in, pause the game. No one should play turns too, because I'm not sure yet about what to do and it may involve reloading.

I'm a bit busy at the moment, so I'll take a look at things about an hour from now.
Find
Reply

#417
March 4th, 2014, 18:54
Gavagai Offline
Regular User
Posts: 4,671
Threads: 36
Joined: Feb 2013
I've already paused.
Find
Reply

#418
March 4th, 2014, 19:00
Gaspar Offline
Still the same O.G.
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
Reload and retire to AI should be fine, and everyone should treat him like a non-entity diplomatically as Seven suggested.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
Find
Reply

#419
March 4th, 2014, 19:52
Mikehendi Offline
Regular User
Posts: 197
Threads: 1
Joined: Oct 2013
Before anything else, we need a reload to the start of the turn before Bantams played. No argument on that.

I'm uncomfortable though with the idea of retiring to AI in any Multiplayer game, since the AI might do something like moving defenders out of cities or something equally insane. Could we have someone volunteer to sub in for these turns instead? They don't have to do anything other than hit end turn and fortify units inside cities. I still think that's preferable to retiring to the AI.
"Great reports Mikendy and your therad is first thing which i read when i open RB." - mackoti
Find
Reply

#420
March 4th, 2014, 20:07
wetbandit Offline
User Regular
Posts: 2,744
Threads: 18
Joined: Feb 2013
Echoing some previous sentiments, I'd prefer if someone were able to step in for the last ditch defense, if that's what it is. And if there's a willing volunteer. Regardless, I'm sure Ichabod and Co. will come up with an appropriate solution.
Find
Reply



Forum Jump: