WW17 - A Game of Thrones

[Lewwyn]

I'm happy with the result, I still think Rowain is scum and TT's flip was as Jkaen would say, "2 down, 1 to go" about my earlier theory. I'm still suspicious of Zak because I do not think its beyond imagination that Zak as scum would lynch TT. However I'm expanding my suspect list to include Qgqqqqq who somehow can't understand my argument about Zak, but still votes for him. So currently, Rowain is #1, Qgqqqq is #2, Zak is #3. If we only have 2 scum left, which feels likely then technically Zak is in the clear.

I don't feel bad about possibly being wrong Zak, it's WW.

Also... Mardoc possibly? Can't just assume double voter is innocent.

[Mardoc]

Also... Mardoc possibly? Can't just assume double voter is innocent.

No shit, Sherlock. Especially in a game that Uber's running.

It'd be a mistake, but with three dead traitors it's one you can probably afford. And it's not like I've been a terribly useful loyalist.

[pindicator]

Azza, maybe we should be giving you props as well.

QT thread post 306, after day 1 lynch:

Some thoughts on the deadline madness;

I'd be very surprised if none of the 3 remaining people who were on the block are scum. I'd probably lean towards pindicator being scummy due to the way the bandwagon on him dissipated at the last moment, and Twinkletoes being town since he seemed to be the target of the late push.

I think that Ichabod's crusade against TT is a sign that he's town. I don't think scum would put their neck out like that, not on day 1. My guess is that one of Brick and Rowain (the two jumpers) is scum, as the two remaining jumpers on the bandwagon.

Serdoa, Brick and Zak were the three to jump off Pindicator late (who weren't lynched RIP Bigger). I reckon one of these guys is probably scum too.

I still don't like Qgqqqq's no-voting. It doesn't help the town at all, since it gives the mafia a greater ability to manipulate the final vote count, and there's no pressure placed on anyone to draw out responses. You're definitely in my top 2 suspects at this stage along with Brick.

[Jkaen]

Well done all on getting TT.

Guess its at the point now I need to reread, but with 2 non village but non scum roles already revealed, I wouldnt be surprised if zak moved into that grouping as well given he did help on TT quite a bit, but does seem a bit 'off'

[Qgqqqqq]

WTF lewwyn?!?

I understand your zak case perfectly, thats why I voted him!

if your reffering to my wanting to know reasoning by morning, i was asking you to explain the comments that i was "suiciding" (after Azza vote) and "...quality rowaining" (p409).

[Rowain]

So currently, Rowain is #1, Qgqqqq is #2, Zak is #3. If we only have 2 scum left, which feels likely then technically Zak is in the clear.

Yeah Lewwyn you are sooo great. Voting loyalist Brick on day 1, Lynching loyalist Mattimeo on day 2, declaring Traitor TT as surefire innocent and obv lynchbait on day 3 - even trying hard to get people to vote for zak (the last one that might get enough following to get you lynched) and not TT and now trying to get loyalist Rowain lynched on day 4.

[Lewwyn]

WTF lewwyn?!?

I understand your zak case perfectly, thats why I voted him!

if your reffering to my wanting to know reasoning by morning, i was asking you to explain the comments that i was "suiciding" (after Azza vote) and "...quality rowaining" (p409).

Jokes...

[Lewwyn]

So currently, Rowain is #1, Qgqqqq is #2, Zak is #3. If we only have 2 scum left, which feels likely then technically Zak is in the clear.

Yeah Lewwyn you are sooo great. Voting loyalist Brick on day 1, Lynching loyalist Mattimeo on day 2, declaring Traitor TT as surefire innocent and obv lynchbait on day 3 - even trying hard to get people to vote for zak (the last one that might get enough following to get you lynched) and not TT and now trying to get loyalist Rowain lynched on day 4.

Yes I am great.

[Tasunke]

Its funny, I feel like either Lewwyn or Rowain would be a quality lynch tomorrow ...

[Qgqqqqq]

But there was clearly reasoning behind them.

I realised at the time that the "Rowaining" comment could be a j"oke" but there is also the implicit message that the reads are bad, hence my question.
I also do not see the leeming post as having any humour (if missed i apologise) but instead as a general attack on the argument. Hence, once again, my question.


Also... is that what you meant by not understanding? Or hav i missed it entirely