Self-quote:
Boy, did that ever happen. Mack took all but two of Cairo's cities, and poofed his zombies into nothingness, proving once again that the Elohim are Kryptonite to the Sheaim. I'm guessing this is my last turn; I pulled all my units back into my cities to try to avoid giving Cairo the satisfaction of going out in a blaze of glory by capturing a city.
If the other guys are angry at me for facilitating Mack's victory, it was the old story of "what do you do when you have no chance of winning?"
My attitude is best summed up in civ diplo screen fashion:
Mackoti:
+3 our open borders have brought our people close together
+3 we appreciate the years you supplied us with resources
-1 you sniped our horseman
Bob:
+3 our open borders have brought our people close together
+3 you didn't snipe our great merchant
-4 you have traded with our worst enemies
Aurorarcher
+3 our open borders have brought our people close together
+3 we appreciate the years you supplied us with resources
+3 thanks for the enchanted blades
Cairo
-3 you declared war on us
-3 our citizens yearn to join their motherland
-5 you forced us to use the great prophet who was supposed to bulb Priesthood on a pathetically weak golden age
-5 you forced us to waste our disciple of leaves (who was supposed to spread FoL) for a border pop
Or, alternatively: Mack clearly played the best game, so I think he deserves to win. Well played, Mackoti.
Lurkers: I still concede to Mackoti, in case there's any doubt.
(May 6th, 2019, 11:50)DaveV Wrote: Cairo offered peace again, but that's not happening. If he's invaded on the other side of his empire and all his units are out of position, that will be a real shame.
Boy, did that ever happen. Mack took all but two of Cairo's cities, and poofed his zombies into nothingness, proving once again that the Elohim are Kryptonite to the Sheaim. I'm guessing this is my last turn; I pulled all my units back into my cities to try to avoid giving Cairo the satisfaction of going out in a blaze of glory by capturing a city.
If the other guys are angry at me for facilitating Mack's victory, it was the old story of "what do you do when you have no chance of winning?"
My attitude is best summed up in civ diplo screen fashion:
Mackoti:
+3 our open borders have brought our people close together
+3 we appreciate the years you supplied us with resources
-1 you sniped our horseman
Bob:
+3 our open borders have brought our people close together
+3 you didn't snipe our great merchant
-4 you have traded with our worst enemies
Aurorarcher
+3 our open borders have brought our people close together
+3 we appreciate the years you supplied us with resources
+3 thanks for the enchanted blades
Cairo
-3 you declared war on us
-3 our citizens yearn to join their motherland
-5 you forced us to use the great prophet who was supposed to bulb Priesthood on a pathetically weak golden age
-5 you forced us to waste our disciple of leaves (who was supposed to spread FoL) for a border pop
Or, alternatively: Mack clearly played the best game, so I think he deserves to win. Well played, Mackoti.
Lurkers: I still concede to Mackoti, in case there's any doubt.