Irgy Wrote:Anyway, back on topic; Do you have a summary of your reasons Ichabod? Not so much because I'm struggling to read through all of that, but because when I do it's all a scattering of this and that with no real theme to it that I can discern. My point is, if you can summarise it, that would help clarify your thinking, and if you can't summarise it effectively then I think that highlights a problem with it.
I admit that my theory is very circumstancial. It's not solid. But it's the best I have until now. So, here's the summary.
I feel that Selrahc's play has been very cintradictory up until now.
1st. His vote for MJW: He never explained it properly during the day 1. He just used the "we can be sure he's not a wolf and if he's a villager he's useless". Later, druing day 2, he said that he already had given proper reasons for the vote and that he was very suspicious that MJW could have been a wolf.
But no one ever explained to me why MJW seemed to be a wolf. That's my problem with Lewwyn too. It's not a given fact, so I'd like to hear an explanation. Neither of them gave me one, though.
2nd. A lot of his posts are motivational posts to the village. "Let's not get nervous", "we can still win", "I like that we are discussing things". But it's just that. He never actually contributed to the discussion, never brought any new theories. I'd go as far to say that he never properly justified one of his votes.
Like I said before, this kind of posts seem to be a perfect cover for a wolf, IMO. They are pro-village, they have some content and they don't attract suspicions. Of course, they could be posted by villagers, but when they are the only thing that someone says, it start to feel weird. Especially when you lack any kind of proper participation (no discussions, no vote justifications, no new theories).
3rd. Selrahc said to Roland, after people were suspecting him (Roland) based on his not so long posts from this game, that he should keep calm, that everybody would be suspected in this game.
But, after two votes for him, Selrahc posted a very exasperated post, with very angry answers. But, after this one angry post he followed with much calmer responses. But seeing as we kept suspecting him, he simply decided to ignore the ones voting for him and later disappeared.
I can't understand this behaviour progression, so it seems suspect to me.
4th. Selrahc is capable of contentfull posts. But the only time he posted such posts in this game was when he was called to explain something. He never posted any kind of elaborate thoughts on his own, with his iniciative.
When not explaining himself, Selrahc has been extremely succinct. He only talks when called.
So, when adding all this things together, it gives me a strange feeling. It feels like Selrahc is playing two games, not just one. It's very contradictory. And, to me, in my innexperience with this kind of game, this feels like wolf behaviour.
