WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives

[Ichabod]

Hang on Ichabod, let me find all your solid contributions that aren't from the last 3 hours...

...

...


Ok, got them.

I'm defending because while the votes aren't there there are more voices in the thread pointing at me instead of you and I think its important whether you're guilty or not that people understand you're inept at reading me. I'm also defending because before the past couple hours you contributed fuck all nothing so other than the bit zak already presented there was nothing else to say. Plus, let's be honest, I'm lazy. Anyway, I'll get back to you later tonight when I have more time.

I haven't dropped Catwalk/Injera - at no point did I ever suggest I thought either was cleared. I just was hoping to get something interesting out of you first, since apparently nobody else was particularly interested in that.

Anyway, I'll be back later. Try and find my inner zen.

I admit that I didn't make any contributions on day 1, not on the beggining of day 2, due to being busy. At least I'm not complaining about the others, though. You, on the other hand, talks like if you had everything figured out, but the actual content is extremely lacking.

And I'm presenting my case against you and why I find you suspicious. Now other people can read it and make their assumptions. And it's nice that now you are pointing out that "I can't read you", while some time ago it was something like "I think I can read you better than I do so I'm trying to mislynch you". The change of tone seems pretty obvious to me.

So, may I ask all the "Gaspar is easy to read" gang what they think about Gaspar in this game. I don't remember seeing many people comment about you today...

[Qgqqqqq]

Also novice were you told anything about how long it lasts
a) 1day-night cycle
b) till a wolf is killed
c) till game end
d) no knowledge
e) none of the above

[uberfish]

It's more about the fact that he voted for mattimeo and the time of that vote. And may I say that this comment is very scummy, Uberfish. Especially by using the "mild suspect" wording outside of the context of that post (and without quoting it).

How on earth is my comment scummy? You didn't quote thestick's post yourself, or even explain your read... and I still do not see how the timing clears matt. The later shift to matt was based on matt's #217 (voting tasunke) rather than anything Thestick posted.

[Ichabod]

How on earth is my comment scummy? You didn't quote thestick's post yourself, or even explain your read... and I still do not see how the timing clears matt. The later shift to matt was based on matt's #217 (voting tasunke) rather than anything Thestick posted.

I didn't quote the post because it has a lot of inner quotes that wouldn't show up, so I asked everyone to go read it, while providing the number.

The scuminess of your post is not based on the fact that you disagree with my take on that particular post, which you can do despite of alignment. But cherry picking the words "mild suspicious" and using them outside of the context of the post (in which thestick voted for Mattimeo and didn't put anyone above mild suspicious) leads me to believe you were trying to paint my comment and myself in a bad way, instead of only countering my comment with your arguments.

[Twinkletoes89]

I'm starting to think this Ichabod stuff is more distraction than anything else. Its starting to annoy me.

I'm not convinced on Ichabod. Too much of the case against him seems to be resting on the fact that zak suspected him. Now just because zak is innocent doesn't mean he was right.

I'm waiting on a response from Mattimeo as to the full name of his role. Perhaps the vote will help.

[uberfish]

Gaspar answer this.

I think its a pretty reasonable assumption that the scum has gotten their act together after yesterday's wake-up call. Or rather, its an incredibly dangerous assumption that they will remain as obviously disorganized and terribad as yesterday.

How do you know that scum were "obviously disorganized"?

[waterbat]

How on earth is my comment scummy? You didn't quote thestick's post yourself, or even explain your read... and I still do not see how the timing clears matt. The later shift to matt was based on matt's #217 (voting tasunke) rather than anything Thestick posted.

yes - exactly! I just read this myself as I was going to second Ichabod's assertion - it was the very similar to the one that I had put earlier - but it wasn't thestick offering up an alternative as I had thought - it was later - the 217 post in particular that started that run.

But uberfish - you don't find the fact that the mattimeo wagon grew so quickly odd? If he's a wolf, it was all jittery villagers? It was weirdly timed attempts at future cover? Don't you think we can find some scum in those voters?

having trouble with browser so cant effectively search.

[uberfish]

The scuminess of your post is not based on the fact that you disagree with my take on that particular post, which you can do despite of alignment. But cherry picking the words "mild suspicious" and using them outside of the context of the post (in which thestick voted for Mattimeo and didn't put anyone above mild suspicious) leads me to believe you were trying to paint my comment and myself in a bad way, instead of only countering my comment with your arguments.

??? but that's my point. Thestick only put Matt down as mildly suspicious, it wasn't exactly a strong attack. And putting someone in a mildly suspicious list leaves Thestick a lot of room to switch votes later. So, I wanted to find out why you ruled it out as a possible distancing interaction. After all, there might be something important I missed. Really not sure why you think I was discrediting you.

[waterbat]

Its starting to annoy me.

I'm not convinced on Ichabod.

I'm waiting on a response from Mattimeo as to the full name of his role. Perhaps the vote will help.

2 out of 3 ain't bad.

1) it annoys me too
2) me either
3) i dont think this is going to tell us anything of use at all

We have better targets in the mattimeo - bigger - thestick wagons to sort out... and we should target someone who didn't even vote?

[Twinkletoes89]

3) i dont think this is going to tell us anything of use at all

I disagree. He has absolutely no reason to lie about his flavour role name if he is innocent. He's revealed what it actually does.

If he refuses then I think he has something to hide.