February 22nd, 2024, 09:41
Posts: 637
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2018
First. Do we know if combat occured or if combat related intel was gained during turn that have been played?
Second. Does someone object reload?
Completed: pb38, pb40, pb41, pb42, pb46 and pb49
Playing: pbem78
February 22nd, 2024, 11:33
Posts: 4,671
Threads: 36
Joined: Feb 2013
(February 22nd, 2024, 09:41)Hitru Wrote: First. Do we know if combat occured or if combat related intel was gained during turn that have been played?
Second. Does someone object reload?
Scooter played and he is at war. I suggest lurkers contact him directly as I don't think he checks this thread regularly. Amicalola also jumped into the game but he did not unpause, so we can assume he did not touch anything.
February 22nd, 2024, 11:49
Posts: 637
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2018
Yeah, I assume that Amica did not do anything. Scooter needs to be contacted. If Scooter did not do anything war related and feels he can replay the turn we should probably ask players who are most affected with reload. If they are ok I suggest we get it done quick and continue.
Anyone having any other suggestions? Is this something you can live with Plemo?
Completed: pb38, pb40, pb41, pb42, pb46 and pb49
Playing: pbem78
February 22nd, 2024, 12:20
Posts: 7,605
Threads: 36
Joined: Jan 2006
(February 22nd, 2024, 05:43)Qgqqqqq Wrote: Also, I don't really think this is one for the lurkers to decide. I think the players can make this call. You know the issue, and can guess at what the consequences might be.
There's disagreement about this in the lurker thread as well; whether it is fair to have the players decide.
At this point lurker sentiment tends against a reload.
At this point player sentiment tends against a reload.
Both are fairly small sample sizes though.
February 22nd, 2024, 12:36
Posts: 6,681
Threads: 44
Joined: Nov 2019
As I don't think we are getting larger sample sizes I would say play on.
February 22nd, 2024, 12:39
Posts: 17,837
Threads: 162
Joined: May 2011
(February 22nd, 2024, 12:36)Mjmd Wrote: As I don't think we are getting larger sample sizes I would say play on. Hopefully we're still in Amicalola's window.
February 22nd, 2024, 12:39
(This post was last modified: February 22nd, 2024, 12:40 by Ginger*.)
Posts: 507
Threads: 5
Joined: Dec 2022
I’m pro reload bc failing a queue upgrade of this magnitude is a loss of >900 gold according to my math, that’s like clicking a great merchant into enemy territory, which sucks
Edit: I see Mjmd’s called it nvm
Peace is non-negotiable
February 22nd, 2024, 12:42
Posts: 17,418
Threads: 78
Joined: Nov 2005
(February 22nd, 2024, 12:39)Commodore Wrote: (February 22nd, 2024, 12:36)Mjmd Wrote: As I don't think we are getting larger sample sizes I would say play on. Hopefully we're still in Amicalola's window.
Yeah, there's no need to rush a decision / can let more people see and respond. This turn will likely be delayed by a day due to missing amica's window.
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
February 22nd, 2024, 12:43
(This post was last modified: February 22nd, 2024, 12:45 by Ginger*.)
Posts: 507
Threads: 5
Joined: Dec 2022
Going forward I think we should either appoint an arbiter for games like CF or have a better common ruling on what’s given and not given
Because I understand Commodore’s annoyance at not being able to log in to the daily dopamine but if II were in Plemo’s shoes I would be vey tilted and struggle to enjoy the game
Peace is non-negotiable
February 22nd, 2024, 12:55
Posts: 17,418
Threads: 78
Joined: Nov 2005
Ginger, typically the lurkers have taken on the arbiter role by committee.
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
|