The no-scouting clause is fine. After all, we can use spies instead.
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore |
Diplomacy Master Thread- Helping Your Opponents Beat Themselves
|
The no-scouting clause is fine. After all, we can use spies instead.
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
I am fine with the WPC proposal.
On the point of scouting: Remember that we were not really surprised by civplayers landing the Oracle, because of our C&D numbers. As kjn can tell you getting those numbers match up becomes increasingly more difficult with each turn. Every city tile we defog will help immensely constraining the system kjn has to solve. Mh
"You have been struck down!" - Tales of Dwarf Fortress
--- "moby_harmless seeks thee not. It is thou, thou, that madly seekest him!" (November 17th, 2012, 13:15)mostly_harmless Wrote: I am fine with the WPC proposal. But either way I imagine we'll have to change our C&D efforts eventually to tracking graphs and using Alphabet to track techs.
I have to run.
Headed to bed so I'm just going to leave this here, but we just got this from CFC:
CFC Wrote:Hi Scooter / RB, (November 20th, 2012, 00:18)scooter Wrote: Headed to bed so I'm just going to leave this here, but we just got this from CFC: That sounds like there is something delicious east of the oasis, but we are not going to settle that area probably anytime soon so it's reasonable for them to have it. We can later take that city by force!
They clearly want to stay on our good side with the opening paragraph.
Sucks that we won't be getting control over the Oasis. Oh well, make up for it by taking land from our other neighbours. Question, who did we predict would be to our southwest?
Well, if CFC settle the area around the oasis before us, we can't stop them - they will beat us in the settling race.
That said, I'd like some clarification on what they mean with "oasis in the BFC". I'd like to make sure it doesn't interfere with a city by the banana and spices or by the southern corn. Here's how I read it: 1E, 1NE, 2E, 2E1S of the oasis: OK 1N, 1SE of the oasis: not OK
Furthermore, I consider that forum views should be fluid in width
Well, in theory, they could settle on the oasis "column" based on the current deal.
That they inform us about their city placement is a good sign. And there is nothing we can do to prevent it. And we shouldn't. We have a deal, they are obeying the rules and they even informed us about the city placement. Fine. We should discuss how we want to handle the no-scouting option here. I am in favour of scouting out their territory. Obviously for C&R reasons but also because we can't wait for airships to reveal our neighbours land. And if we surround ourselves with no-scouting deals, how are we going to meet the remaining 4 civs? mh
"You have been struck down!" - Tales of Dwarf Fortress
--- "moby_harmless seeks thee not. It is thou, thou, that madly seekest him!"
Given that they're asking us about the city, it makes sense for them to let us make the scout/no-scout decision. We're in a short window here where we could ask favors of them probably.
Yes, first thing we want to do is figure out what part of the Oasis they'll get. I'll ask them exactly where in relation to the Oasis they plan to settle. One thing - tomorrow afternoon I'll be headed out of town for Thanksgiving, and I'll be gone until Sunday night. It might be good for someone to function as temporary diplomat during that time in case a message needs a quick response, as I won't really be doing any of this stuff during that time. Any volunteers?
Sent to CFC:
RB Wrote:Caledorn, |