September 19th, 2012, 06:47
Posts: 4,138
Threads: 54
Joined: Dec 2009
I'm not convinced on the Sareln lynch.
He seems to play the same regardless of his alignment and I don't see much we can hold him to to suggest that he is suspicious.
If we are wanting to lynch a lurker, then there are people with less posts that Sareln, but I don't like taking a crapshoot at someone just because they lurk as a mislynch gives us no information.
Lynching uberfish would give us more info really, and we need information early. We could be lucky and Sareln is mafia, but it would be a success almost entirely down to luck, which is not what I like
"You want to take my city of Troll%ng? Go ahead and try."
September 19th, 2012, 06:49
Posts: 6,630
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2010
September 19th, 2012, 06:54
Posts: 6,630
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2010
Twinkletoes89 Wrote:Lynching uberfish would give us more info really, and we need information early. We could be lucky and Sareln is mafia, but it would be a success almost entirely down to luck, which is not what I like
1. What information do we gain by lynching uberfish?
2. Why would the Sareln-lynch luck despite a pretty good case build for it?
I mean, I'm fine with lynching uberfish, I really don't like his play. But that doesn't mean I do like your play either TT. I think you just try to make the uberfish-lynch sound like the best idea ever because he tries to get you lynched. And villagers should really not do that, no matter how annoying is. It is just bad play as a villager.
September 19th, 2012, 06:54
Posts: 2,534
Threads: 22
Joined: Jan 2012
I'm not particularly thrilled by a potential Sareln lynch, as the two scummiest players right now in my eyes are uberfish and Catwalk. I'm not yet sold on Sareln, so I'm sticking with what I'm more confident of.
September 19th, 2012, 06:55
Posts: 10,065
Threads: 82
Joined: May 2012
No in this case uber is perfectly justified - that is, imho, a horrible post.
It just feels very strained, like your making an effort - and it still comes out crazy!
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
September 19th, 2012, 06:56
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
uberfish Wrote:post #835 is horrible, lynch please
uberfish
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
September 19th, 2012, 06:58
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
Qgqqqqq Wrote:No in this case uber is perfectly justified - that is, imho, a horrible post.
It just feels very strained, like your making an effort - and it still comes out crazy!
I don't see anything wrong with TT's post. the mattimeo bit is classic TT paranoia, and the rest is fine.
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
September 19th, 2012, 07:01
Posts: 4,138
Threads: 54
Joined: Dec 2009
Serdoa Wrote:1. What information do we gain by lynching uberfish?
2. Why would the Sareln-lynch luck despite a pretty good case build for it?
I mean, I'm fine with lynching uberfish, I really don't like his play. But that doesn't mean I do like your play either TT. I think you just try to make the uberfish-lynch sound like the best idea ever because he tries to get you lynched. And villagers should really not do that, no matter how annoying is. It is just bad play as a villager.
From what I have read about the Sareln lynch, I don't see a case that convinces me. If he wasn't a lurker, I don't think the case would have come about. 'Lynch a Lurker' policy seems to me to be more favourable to the wolves than the village as I think the chances of a mislynch are higher.
I'm not trying to make the Uberfish lynch seem like the best idea ever, I'm simply explaining why I think he (in my mind) is the best candidate for a lynch. I believe his guilt more than anyone else so I'm trying to move the lynch away from those I am uncertain of (at best), to someone who just seems to be giving off mafia vibes to me.
"You want to take my city of Troll%ng? Go ahead and try."
September 19th, 2012, 07:03
Posts: 6,630
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2010
Qgqqqqq Wrote:No in this case uber is perfectly justified - that is, imho, a horrible post.
It just feels very strained, like your making an effort - and it still comes out crazy!
Same goes for uberfish of course but: Either make clear explanations as to what you don't like at a post or expect to get votes. Simple as that. No matter if I agree with TT or not, but your post does definitely offer much less to the village. At least his gives ideas about his thinking - yours? Just an attack without justification. It reads more like you just try to get him not to post anymore than to actually discuss with him about it.
On that matter: Didn't you post some time ago that you wouldn't post again today?
September 19th, 2012, 07:05
Posts: 6,630
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2010
Qgqqqqq Wrote:Oh and off the pc, so you wont get another wall of text today.
Ah this was it. So I guess that meant you are just away from the PC and back to your... whatever else you use to make posts here?
|
