WW 19 Game Thread - Mobster Mayhem - GAME OVER

[Ryan]

Waterbat did you link the right thing? I am sure you didnt make 200 posts.

[Serdoa]

I was going to also lie and counterclaim the gun against tasunke! Because I thought he was lying and I could protect the gun owner. If he was telling the truth, I could protect him from night kill. I couldn't work out to protect him and I both from lynch though.

Let me get this straight: You intended to lie and counterclaim against Tasunke - what most certainly would have gotten him lynched. And then you claim that if he had said the truth your lie would have protected him from the night-kill. How? Because he would have been lynched dead already?

I think a wolf tripped here, trying to get village-brownie-points.

[color]waterbat[/color]

He says he could have protected the gun owner, not Tasunke.

No, he writes "If he was telling the truth, I could protect him from night kill.". The 'he' in this sentence can only mean Tasunke.

[Ryan]

Thanks MJW. I'm always a nice dumping ground for votes. As stated the only defense I had planned was a fake claim against tasunke's.

@ryan. Here is a post count link for ww15:

http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/misc.php?...d&tid=5356

Based on that, who's more likely to be scum? Certainly not waterbat at the top o the list, right?

I've answered why I was lurking. Didn't have much to add. Please let me know what you want me to answer.

@mjw: didn't you also vote Rowain? You want to be 3/3 killing villagers?

I miss understood but how does having the most post count in an old ww any proof that your less scum? Am i miss understanding? I dont think whatever you wrote about lurking is valid.

@Serdoa But would the scum waste an entire days worth of discussion on someone who isnt scum? They could have kept this going and a discussion about Tasunke is good or bad. If you are correct maybe hes baiting us to lynch Azza aswell ? I still think we should focus on Waterbat , and selrahc. For today and just keep an eye on Azza.

[novice]

I was going to also lie and counterclaim the gun against tasunke! Because I thought he was lying and I could protect the gun owner. If he was telling the truth, I could protect him from night kill. I couldn't work out to protect him and I both from lynch though.

Let me get this straight: You intended to lie and counterclaim against Tasunke - what most certainly would have gotten him lynched. And then you claim that if he had said the truth your lie would have protected him from the night-kill. How? Because he would have been lynched dead already?

I think a wolf tripped here, trying to get village-brownie-points.

[color]waterbat[/color]

He says he could have protected the gun owner, not Tasunke.

No, he writes "If he was telling the truth, I could protect him from night kill.". The 'he' in this sentence can only mean Tasunke.

Yeah you're right, the "If he was telling the truth" part makes no sense.

[Ryan]

So basically Waterbat I am not convinced with your counter arguments and your explanaton on why you are lurking. Also, I dont think what your saying or your claims are valid. You dodged novices question which included mine. I think lynching you today is better and let the vigi and any other seer, item owner actually speak tomorrow. Since thier item passes would be complete. and then we could question Azza etc.

[Ryan]

Actually I might be wrong. If Azza lock picked Tasunke then. She might have his weapon or item or whatever.

[waterbat]

@ Serdoa. I stated I couldn't work out how to protect him from the lynch if he wasn't actually lying. I stated that in the post.

I was trying to find an optimal play that would protect him if a) he had the gun innocent or b) he didn't have the gun innocent. If he was guilty and telling the truth about the gun, I wasnt worried about the consequences. If he was guilty and lying, same thing.

If I'm trying to earn brownie points, why'd I tell Ryan to fuck off? He's my scum buddy?

I do t have a large post record to form a defense and not much time to put into scum hunting.

You know, since tasunke hinted at gun/bomb/bulletproof prior to N1, scum with the gloves would certainly like to get their hands on one of those. Not sure scum (azza) would expose themselves though. I was
Up for lynch - tasunke probably going to get revealed when he can't pass it. I don't think scum needed to out Tasunke at that moment. I guess I'm waffling on azza in this paragraph. Hmmm.

[Lewwyn]

Actually I might be wrong. If Azza lock picked Tasunke then. She might have his weapon or item or whatever.

We went over this. If Azza was successful, Tas would have had the lockpicks then.

[Ryan]

I do t have a large post record to form a defense and not much time to put into scum hunting.

You know, since tasunke hinted at gun/bomb/bulletproof prior to N1, scum with the gloves would certainly like to get their hands on one of those. Not sure scum (azza) would expose themselves though. I was
Up for lynch - tasunke probably going to get revealed when he can't pass it. I don't think scum needed to out Tasunke at that moment. I guess I'm waffling on azza in this paragraph. Hmmm.

I am not listening to the I didnt have time or I was just lurking waiting for information argument. Bigger got away with it and I am not giving you the same. + you told me to fuck off instead of responding properly. But I do agree on one thing. Tasunke claimed an item up untill the night was over. If i am correct he didnt post this day. WHICH MEANS that there is a strong chance Azza lock picked him.

[Ryan]

Actually I might be wrong. If Azza lock picked Tasunke then. She might have his weapon or item or whatever.

We went over this. If Azza was successful, Tas would have had the lockpicks then.

Ignore what I just posted about Azza I misread the earlier post.