Posts: 1,212
Threads: 9
Joined: Mar 2007
i still think the whole mayor voting thing for breaking ties is a bad way of dealing with ties
it's much easier and makes more sense to just lynch the guy who first reached that amount of votes
adding a mayor role that is voted by the players is unnecessary and can cause balance issues, makes the game much more random. If you just clearly state that for example the first person to reach the number of votes that created the tie gets lynched, then everyone will know that and vote accordingly. Like a wolf will be hesitant to throw a vote on his team mate to seem unsuspicious since that vote could doom his fellow wolf to die in a tie break, etcetera.
No need to needlessly complicate everything with a superfluous mayor role.