December 5th, 2006, 12:20
Posts: 3,046
Threads: 49
Joined: Mar 2004
We would not only need to be able to travel or at least communicate at speeds much greater than lightspeed, but also perceive at speeds much greater than lightspeed, over nearly incomprehensible distances and an equally incomprehensibly large volume of space, assuming we even know what to look for in the first place. The images we see through Hubble are not of those galaxies as they are today, but as they were 78 billion years ago. In order to interact with another form of life, we need to be able to perceive it in the present and communicate with it in the present.
Travel at near-lightspeed is almost certainly insufficient for first contact in the forseeable future. Even assuming there are extra-solar planets nearby that are worth colonizing, and that we are capable of building a suitable colony ship that will keep colonists alive for the duration of the trip, we can barely colonize a small portion of our own galaxy that way. This is not to say it wouldn't be worthwhile doing anyway; every ambitious endeavor begins with a first step. But I don't see exploring our local stellar neighborhood leading to a first contact scenario -- it could reasonably be argued that there are likely no other sentient life forms within the whole of our own galaxy, for that matter. It's only when we start thinking about the staggeringly huge number of stars in the universe as a whole, and the correspondingly huge volume of space that represents, that the likelihood of other life being out there starts seeming to approach unity.