As a French person I feel like it's my duty to explain strikes to you. - AdrienIer
Create an account  
Realms Beyond Forum     Gaming     Civ Game Reporting     Succession Games     RB21 Succession Game

 
RB21 Succession Game

#21
February 27th, 2007, 12:52 (This post was last modified: February 27th, 2007, 13:08 by sooooo.)
sooooo Offline
Member
Posts: 1,404
Threads: 53
Joined: Apr 2006
I have one other variant idea, but it involves building 28 settlers on a large map. Potentially even more tedious lol.

EDIT: Only 26 smile
Find
Reply

#22
February 27th, 2007, 13:57
sunrise089 Offline
Not that good
Posts: 6,471
Threads: 63
Joined: Sep 2006
sooooo Wrote:I have one other variant idea, but it involves building 28 settlers on a large map. Potentially even more tedious lol.

EDIT: Only 26 smile
Explain yourself, sir!
Find
Reply

#23
February 27th, 2007, 16:37
Raven_Lore Offline
Regular User
Posts: 47
Threads: 5
Joined: Oct 2006
Please Do....
Find
Reply

#24
February 27th, 2007, 18:51
sooooo Offline
Member
Posts: 1,404
Threads: 53
Joined: Apr 2006
Well that game will take ages and I have remembered I will be away later this year so I won't take the idea any further.
Find
Reply

#25
February 28th, 2007, 10:54
Kylearan Offline
Regular User
Posts: 1,922
Threads: 68
Joined: Mar 2004
Hi,

exactly what Sulla said: Not keen on playing the same variant again; haven't played Civ in months; don't have Warlords (I still plan to buy it once an RB Warlords event appears...although it looks like my money can be spent elsewhere... rolleye ); but would be open to a new variant. In fact, I plan to host a succession game myself as soon as my new monitor has arrived (should happen next week or so), but I would be happy to play in another one's SG as well if the variant is interesting. smile

-Kylearan
There are two kinds of fools. One says, "This is old, and therefore good." And one says, "This is new, and therefore better." - John Brunner, The Shockwave Rider
Website Find
Reply

#26
February 28th, 2007, 12:01
regoarrarr Offline
Member
Posts: 7,548
Threads: 63
Joined: Dec 2005
Same as sullla and kylearan, except I do have warlords.
Find
Reply

#27
February 28th, 2007, 13:01
Sullla Offline
Administrator
Posts: 6,653
Threads: 246
Joined: Aug 2004
Well... I don't want to steal sooooo's thunder if he has a variant ready and willing to go, but perhaps I could throw out some of the Civ4 SG ideas I haven't tried yet here (?) The top one on my list right now is a modification of the Passive-Aggressive theme that I wrote about on my website some time ago. In short, we must win by Conquest, but we cannot capture cities. lol EVERYTHING must be culture-flipped. I'm 100% convinced that this is doable, but no one to my knowledge has ever actually made the attempt. Mutineer is trying something related right now in a SG, but he's focusing on vassalizing all of the AIs instead of emphasizing culture (which I think is a flawed approach, but whatever). We'd be allowed to kill defenders to eliminate flip garrisons, but no city captures, ever. The world must be overrun by our culture.

sooooo, Kylearan, regoarrarr - does this sound like something interesting? Or am I taking a shot in the dark here? smile
Follow Sullla: Website | YouTube | Livestream | Twitter | Discord
Website Find
Reply

#28
February 28th, 2007, 13:15
LKendter Offline
Member
Posts: 798
Threads: 46
Joined: Mar 2004
That sounds perverse enough that it would probably worth playing provided the game level isn't to high - no way I would try this on deity since I haven't even tried deity!
Find
Reply

#29
February 28th, 2007, 20:29
darkwatcher Offline
Regular User
Posts: 9
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2006
If no one would mined I would like to play. Ive played several culture games and I want to get some SG experiance and this looks like a fun SG.
Find
Reply

#30
February 28th, 2007, 20:58
Iainuki Offline
Member
Posts: 148
Threads: 9
Joined: Sep 2006
There actually has been a succession game on CivFanatics won by domination via culture-flips, in Always Peace.
Find
Reply



Forum Jump: