Posts: 6,457
Threads: 134
Joined: Aug 2004
I just went over pindicator's accusations and will be cross-posting mostly the same as Jkaen. Here is how I see Ichabod's posts (starting at 778):
1) He used to consider Tasunke innocent and being framed, based on general read
2) Thinks a bi-nightly villager Watcher would be biased against one wolf-pack, taking this to suggest Tasunke is wolf
3) Lists some reasons why Tasunke might not be wolf:
- NH not caring or not noticing this imbalance
- With 3 packs the argument against Tasunke is void
4) Concludes Tasunke is probably not a better lynch than Commodore
5) Points out the unlikeliness of Commodore being the only villager
6) Suggests Commodore might be another wolf watcher = Tasunke is guilty
7) Wants to discuss other targets
8) Brings up Gaspar voting for Tasunke off the bat on day 2 (he also commented on this at that time)
I don't see a shred of what pindicator is getting at, and I have no idea how these posts can convince pindicator of Ichabod's guilt to the point of crusading. None of it clears Ichabod either, but I think these specific accusations are hogwash. I won't claim they make pindicator look guilty, but I disagree with their merit. Ichabod's points aren't super insightful, but I mostly agree with them. If Commodore is a wolf watcher, the case against Tasunke is strengthened considerably.