I'm sorry, maybe i'm being thick but I don't understand why we are getting a new random order. We already chose a random order?
I'll try and explain what I mean briefly. We normally (in all snake picks) use the following order to choose who picks when:
A B C D D C B A
This is acknowledged to be fair as A gets the best and worst civ, D gets two average. It's fairness is why we use it each and every time.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A= 1+8 = 9
B= 2+7 = 9
C= 3+6 = 9
D= 4+5 = 9
Mathematically, this is fair. We all gain the same relative benefit/strength. 'A' would only have an advantage if the first pick was worth significantly more than the 2nd, 3rd or 4th picks. I 100% do not believe this is the case (as evidence by offering to swap). In this situation, I actually believe A has the worst of it and D has the best as there are, in my opinion, 6-7 'top tier' civs.
We were given a random order previously. It was never going to be mathematically fair as that simply isn't possible in this case. Hence, we randomised it. 'A', in this case my team, came first. Why are we now having to go last instead? We already had (and this is totally opinion and not backed up by maths) the worst of it, why are we making it worse when the random order given to us works just fine. I can see absolutely no reason to re-order it.
If i've missed something, please can someone point this out to me.
I'll try and explain what I mean briefly. We normally (in all snake picks) use the following order to choose who picks when:
A B C D D C B A
This is acknowledged to be fair as A gets the best and worst civ, D gets two average. It's fairness is why we use it each and every time.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A= 1+8 = 9
B= 2+7 = 9
C= 3+6 = 9
D= 4+5 = 9
Mathematically, this is fair. We all gain the same relative benefit/strength. 'A' would only have an advantage if the first pick was worth significantly more than the 2nd, 3rd or 4th picks. I 100% do not believe this is the case (as evidence by offering to swap). In this situation, I actually believe A has the worst of it and D has the best as there are, in my opinion, 6-7 'top tier' civs.
We were given a random order previously. It was never going to be mathematically fair as that simply isn't possible in this case. Hence, we randomised it. 'A', in this case my team, came first. Why are we now having to go last instead? We already had (and this is totally opinion and not backed up by maths) the worst of it, why are we making it worse when the random order given to us works just fine. I can see absolutely no reason to re-order it.
If i've missed something, please can someone point this out to me.