I guess it ensures you really read and keep notes of exactly what everybody says
WW14 - The Edge of Reason
|
Jkaen Wrote:I have en in 1 real discussion where I sided with VM/Pind against Rowain if you want to draw sides. Hardly me jumping around buddying up to all and sundry No you really sided with Meiz as you only stepped in after I voted for him. You were voting to lynch VM before your switch (together with Pind) and Pindicator later switched to vote for you. So much for you siding with them. Trying to hide that you buddy up to Meiz? Are you both wolves or is it only you?
G00d m0rn1ng f3ll0w v1ll4g3rs, 1 s33 y0u f4il3d t0 lynch scumB1gg3r wh1l3 1 w4s 4sl33p.
WH4T 4R3 Y0U, S0M3 P4C1F1STS???? N0w t0 r34d ... Rowain Wrote:No you really sided with Meiz as you only stepped in after I voted for him. God your paranioa is incredible. Look at the timings of my vote switch 7.30 GMT ie just after I get in to work and pull up my browser. Look at what I had posted for several hours before hand. Nothing as I was asleep. Thats why I didn't comment on your accusations earlier. Also your pind comments makes it even clearer I am not siding with everybody I can as I was accused
p1nd1 g3t y0ur "f4cts" 0utt4 my f4c3. Y0u just w4nt t0 d3f3nd B1gg3r, d0nt y0u.
n0v1c3 1s 0bvt0wn, s0 1s Jk43n. 1m st1ll f1n3 w1th 4 b1gg3r lynch, th3n p1nd1c4tor. Jkaen Wrote:Look at the timings of my vote switch 7.30 GMT ie just after I get in to work and pull up my browser. The timestamp on this post which is the one you switched your vote to me has the timestamp of Midday my TZ which is 10 AM GMT (or 11 AM for England with DS). So it is not 7:30 GMT.
Agreeing with slowcheetah's points against Bigger, http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/showpost....tcount=144
Definitely did not like how he was laying groundwork for "one of Meiz / Rowain is not innocent", http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/showpost....tcount=135 Also Pidicators buddying up on Zak seemed a bit strange, http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/showpost....tcount=119 Especially part: His post early on about if the posting restrictions have to be done in the wolf thread just seems like he's trying to bait people into voting him. Well, trying to get people talking, even if they are voting against him. If he thought that would be Zak's villager strategy, wouldn't he rather keep quiet instead of saying it out loud for the wolves? Maybe the idea is what he was thinking on Zak's messages, as a wolf. His attack on Jkaen seemed a bit forced. And going for the popular target as well (me that is ![]() Funny how I'm parroting novice who is just quoting ![]()
Meta first.
Someone asked how ties are handled, it's random, unless there is someone/some power that can break the tie. In setup thread, uber said 15 was a difficult number to balance and that it would be either 3 or 4 wolves. So at 16, I'll assume 4 evil-doers. And the 'feel' from setup was that there will be no multi-pack but possibly a lone stranger along with ze wolves. Anyway, people are talking about 'would the serial killer talk about serial killing' but it occured to me that the wolves should probably know if there is one as well. Like if they are a 3-pack, serial killer very likely and vice versa. Just something to keep in mind, if wolves know there is a serial killer they can allow themselves to be active in hunting and blend in better. Guess we can tell if there are two kills tonight. Quote:G00d m0rn1ng f3ll0w v1ll4g3rs, 1 s33 y0u f4il3d t0 lynch scumB1gg3r wh1l3 1 w4s 4sl33p. And VM, there is no early lynch rule this game. Lynch only at end of day. This is unlike those other 3-week games. VM Wrote:n0v1c3 1s 0bvt0wn, s0 1s Jk43n. This I do not like at all. I take it as figure/style of speech that their town memebership is "obvious", but still calling out villagers at this point seems wolfish to me. If you are wolf you know they are villagers, so you get their gratitude for believing in them and later on when they are eaten in the night you are proven right. Second thing is, it seems you thought that a bandwagon could result in an early lynch, in which case I am a bit more sceptical of your strong liking for bandwagons. (First Rowan then Bigger) Why push for early lynches with so little to go on? Better to get more people talking with the little time we have. If you are right, great, but if wrong we suddenly are one man down and starting from scratch again. So would like some input about these points VM. Will have time later on. Meiz Wrote:Pind did not seem to like waterbat's vote against Bigger at all (threatening with vote), http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/showpost....tcount=152I read this more as a defense of Waterbat. He breaks down "the post Zakalwe keeps quoting", seemingly trying to defuse it. I only kept quoting it because Waterbat kept ignoring my requests for clarification. Looks a little like Pindicator is stepping in to take some heat off his struggling buddy. Rereading it now I guess it can be seen as a defense of Bigger, as well. In fact, it reads like he's bringing up points for and against both of them, leaving himself the option of voting for either. That is perhaps a little scummy in its own right. (Only a little, though.) Novice, have you got anything to say about Waterbat? (Hopefully there is enough source material to work with for a few apt quotes.) Same question for Meiz, but feel free to use your own words. ![]()
If you know what I mean.
Molach Wrote:Meta first.0h 0k th3n, y0u guys 4r3 3xcus3d. F0r n0w. Molach Wrote:This I do not like at all. BlaBlaBla...Th1s 1s BS, why c4nt 1 h4v3 t0wnr34ds? Molach Wrote:Second thing is, it seems you thought that a bandwagon could result in an early lynch, in which case I am a bit more sceptical of your strong liking for bandwagons.Wh4t 4r3 y0u 0n, b4ndw4g0ns 4r3 4W3S0M3! 0k s0 n0 34rly lynch ch4ng3s th3 fl0w 0f th1ngs. F0r 0ne, b4ndw4g0ns 4r3 cl0s3 t0 us3l3ss, 4s th3y d0 n0t pr0vid3 th3 pr3ssur3 th3y 4r3 supp0s3d t0. H0w d0 y0u guys push f0r a cla1m? 0nly 4t d34dl1n3? Th4t s0unds r34lly b4d. |