WW14 - The Edge of Reason

[Sareln]

What exactly do you not get? and why do you so insist on the waterbat-thing. And how do you see it: Was chickening waterbat scummy, towny or neutral?


Jkaen I would still like your answers to my questions. zakalwe too:

Who do you see as missing wolf if Bigger turns wolfy?

And who do you see as the 2 missing wolves if Bigger turns up innocent?

So far only pindicator has really bothered to answer.

And since I am in 20questions-mood:
Sareln whom would you vote for if it weren't your nape on 2nd place?

To help you: Molach

When did we start assuming there were 4 wolves?

@Rowain, if it wasn't my neck on the line I'd still be voting Bigger to clarify the Day 1 & Day 3 votes (V/V or V/W, W/V or W/W respectively). I'm not getting strong tells off of anyone. Molach being completely AWOL is rough though if he's guilty since that means in a 3-wolf setup we're not going to get him today and in a 4-wolf setup the one wolf just has to hide in a crowd of 10 (11 - Molach).

[Rowain]

When did we start assuming there were 4 wolves?

Uberfish stated in the setup thread that he thinks 3w of 15 is on the low side so 3w from 16 is clearly too low. Since there have been only single kills (or none) assuming 1 pack of 4 seems logical.

Of course if you have information that says different then please share.

@pindicator: For someone who so insisted on talking to me and asnwers you have gone extremly silent ater I ask you questions:

What exactly do you not get? and why do you so insist on the waterbat-thing. And how do you see it: Was chickening waterbat scummy, towny or neutral?

@Jkaen where are you?

[Jkaen]

What exactly do you not get? and why do you so insist on the waterbat-thing. And how do you see it: Was chickening waterbat scummy, towny or neutral?


Jkaen I would still like your answers to my questions. zakalwe too:

Who do you see as missing wolf if Bigger turns wolfy?

And who do you see as the 2 missing wolves if Bigger turns up innocent?

So far only pindicator has really bothered to answer.

And since I am in 20questions-mood:
Sareln whom would you vote for if it weren't your nape on 2nd place?

To help you: Molach

Regardless, in my mind we now have pretty squarly in villager land:

Jkaen, Mattimeo, Rowain, TT, Novice in probably that order

If Bigger shows as WW, I am happy to place Pind up there too

Molach and Sareln I have no read on

Zak I think slightly village, Waterbat slightly wolf

With aybe you slipping down slighty from that

[Jkaen]

@Jkaen where are you?

Until just now. Down the pub

[Rowain]

Thanks hoped you had some new insights gained from the last 30 hours but I guess there was too much clutter.

[Jkaen]

Other than not reading your role as quite as pro vilage as I originally thought I havent really seen that much to change my thinking

[pindicator]

@pindicator: For someone who so insisted on talking to me and asnwers you have gone extremly silent ater I ask you questions

What exactly do you not get? and why do you so insist on the waterbat-thing. And how do you see it: Was chickening waterbat scummy, towny or neutral?

Yep, at the office and had to duck off a bit. Probably shouldn't be posting here at all. Although nobody here right now is actually working -- friday afternoon, half the office on vacation, and it is way very nice out

Anyway, I think from your answer that I am not stating my question right. The fact that you chickened waterbat is fine, IMO. It may not have been what I would have done in your situation, but I can understand why a village would do it. I'm just having a hard time making sense of your actions towards waterbat after that: In day 3 you never vote for him or put forward a case against him. Then you say he's still a suspect in night 3 (later you change your mind on waterbat based off other evidence).

I was hoping to be a bit more discrete in my questions in case you said something that made sense, but there it is.

Now that I've explained my thinking, can you please reciprocate?

[zakalwe]

Rowain, if Bigger is guilty then several suspects come to mind as plausible partners, but those cards will remain close to my chest for now. If he is innocent, it will surprise me, as already noted in post 875.

That's all you're getting from me, for now. Let's save that speculation for tomorrow. Right now, we've got Bigger's fish to fry. To reiterate, the case against him is quite straightforward. He makes a lot of soothing villager noises, but when it actually comes time to vote, he consistently misses the mark.

[pindicator]

Rowain, if Bigger is guilty then several suspects come to mind as plausible partners, but those cards will remain close to my chest for now. If he is innocent, it will surprise me, as already noted in post 875.

Yeah, I need to learn some patience. You're right. I do agree with you that Bigger is the most likely scum so I'm willing to drop my questions until we see how he flips.

[Rowain]

I'm just having a hard time making sense of your actions towards waterbat after that: In day 3 you never vote for him or put forward a case against him. Then you say he's still a suspect in night 3 (later you change your mind on waterbat based off other evidence).

Well between me chickening him and me returning to the forum lay several hours (~13 ) in which he did make his first chicken-post and there was already a pindicator/slowcheetah in swing. Later came the Biggertrain too.

I thought the day 3 running very well and saw no need to start anything on waterbat.