Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore

Create an account  

 
[SPOILER] ww15 Lurker thread - No living players allowed!

Maniac Wrote:I thought neither Sareln or Jkaen were NAP, so there was nothing for me to do today.

He thinks neither Sareln or Jkaen are NAP. And those two are on the block. His conclusion in this case? Of course that there is nothing to do for him duh Maybe he could have tried to get someone lynched he believed is NAP? Of course I am pretty sure he is NAP - but I am also pretty sure that the village will also let this post from him go without even asking.
Reply

Sareln Wrote:There is no baner.

Planet has a serial killer and it's Selrahc.

BRickAstley and Maniac are NAP. JKaen is false lead.

curious why the village didn't hear about this theory before your death.


Not sure about maniac, but there are a few people that would have voted for Brick, I think, if you had pushed for it harder.
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
Reply

Gah. I'm tasting blood after so much tongue-biting.

Maybe I should make my own "Molach files" so I can comment on the game without spoiling things. smile
If you know what I mean.
Reply

zakalwe Wrote:Gah. I'm tasting blood after so much tongue-biting.

Maybe I should make my own "Molach files" so I can comment on the game without spoiling things. smile

hah, I know the feeling. You should create one and send me the link wink.
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
Reply

novice Wrote:Scum are never to blame for a lazy village. It means they've played well. smile

Absolutly true.

A question to the Napsters:

Why did you leave Lewwyn alive? Why kill catwalk or SC? Did you get too cocky?
Reply

I will say this: I disagree with the planned scum night actions tonight. Just noting it, so I'll remember to comment further after the game.

But I don't think our night actions thus far were our main downfall; in fact, I'd say some of them were downright brilliant. Of course, with the benefit of hindsight they could obviously have been even better.

With my double vote it made some sense to save Lewwyn for an end game push. The Injera lynch was what really pulled the rug out under us. With a mislynch on day 4, our voting power would have been substantial on day 5, particularly if we all ganged up on Lewwyn. Had we known he had two silver bullets with my name on them, we probably would have killed him earlier.
If you know what I mean.
Reply

I see. It does make some sense to keep him alive for such a push.
Reply

probably going to be Brick vs Maniac tomorrow after those posts...
Reply

uberfish Wrote:I see nothing wrong with people keeping diaries - it doesn't prove innocence because wolves can do it too. Sure most wolves wouldn't do it, but most villagers don't do it either

novice Wrote:Yes but it allows you to write unfalsifiable messages to the future village that are not visible at the time they're written, so the opponents don't get the opportunity to react in a timely manner to information that should have been public.

Bigger Wrote:well, that was mardoc's call. Molach asked, I said "im not really sure, hold on" and asked Mardoc. But I think you're right, although a wolf COULD make another private forum, as Gaspar points out it is a lot of work that most wolves wouldnt be willing to do, so it does make you lean village and probably unfairly.

My reasoning was about half of what novice/Gaspar said, and half a rule of thumb 'when in doubt, say no, say no comment, etc'. I'm still smarting from that bodyguard role back in WW...5, I think.

I think on balance the private diary thing is mostly harmless, but then I've been blindsided before by what people can learn from things I considered to be null tells. But the main thing it does inject is confirmation that Molach did say something at the time he claims - while if he copys/pastes into the main thread, he could change the timestamps.
EitB 25 - Perpentach
Occasional mapmaker

Reply

I think the whole "the merchant" thing is a ploy.
Reply



Forum Jump: