[SPOILER] ww15 Lurker thread - No living players allowed!

[Sareln]

Forgot this. My guess is, because his partner Injera + me gained powers while he didn't. Would make sense hed gain something as well. I'm still waiting one more since the corrent one kind of... sucks.

Do Nap notes + "mysterious deaths" take turns? The double kill is because of delayed kill ability Injera had. So my guess is 1 nap and 1 serial killer left. Mine and Injeras power doesn't make sense otherwise. I bet Selrahc is either nap or sk. More likely sk, in wich case it makes sense to play it riskly and claim baner, concidering his situation. Death would mean losing.

Red - NAP tagged kills, Blue - Village Tagged Kills, Green - untagged kills

Night 1 - NAP Noted Catwalk
Night 2 - Pindicator
Night 3 - NAP Noted Slowcheetah, Qgqqqq
Night 4 - NAP Noted Serdoa, Vigshot Zakalwe
Night 5 - NAP Noted Lewwyn
Night 6 - theStick

So the statement has some implicit assumptions:

1. Injera used his ability at the earliest possibility (night 2)
2. NAP/SK/Planet Faction are rolling each day to see whose kill goes through
3. Delaying the NAP kill let a SK or Planet kill go through, while still letting an NAP kill happen on the next night concurrently with another SK/NAP roll.

So it's a helluva thesis to just pop out of thin air. Would make me a bit more suspicious of Meiz and worth forcing a defense over.

[Bigger]

its not out of thin air. He had a similar theory several days ago, when you were still alive.
The alternating kill theory of his new, however. I do think there are simpler explanations - ww12 (which I did play in) proved that doesnt work anyway, imo.

Injera's bomb ability doesnt really explain the 2 kills on night 3, though, you are right - since there WAS a kill on night 2. It doesnt give nap any extra kills, just ment to cause some confusion.

Also, NAP killed the stick <G>. I just didn't feel the need to follow the "tag" route again <G>.

btw, that is kind of how the bomb would work. It can be blocked on the day it was planted (say by a drone riot, baner, or w/ pindicator's ability) but NOT on the night it explodes.

[Bigger]

I find it amusing that 6 of the 7 players remaining have made some sort of "oh, I just feel that it is hopeless for the village, I'm so sad" statement (I think only Maniac has not, and he only shows up to vote and put in a sentence or two anyway).

I think its fairly obvious those 6 are not all villagers

[Sareln]

its not out of thin air. He had a similar theory several days ago, when you were still alive.
The alternating kill theory of his new, however. I do think there are simpler explanations - ww12 (which I did play in) proved that doesnt work anyway, imo.

Injera's bomb ability doesnt really explain the 2 kills on night 3, though, you are right - since there WAS a kill on night 2. It doesnt give nap any extra kills, just ment to cause some confusion.

Also, NAP killed the stick <G>. I just didn't feel the need to follow the "tag" route again <G>.

btw, that is kind of how the bomb would work. It can be blocked on the day it was planted (say by a drone riot, baner, or w/ pindicator's ability) but NOT on the night it explodes.

I think you should have been consistent with tags. Either All NAP kills have tags, or none of them .

[Bigger]

I think you should have been consistent with tags. Either All NAP kills have tags, or none of them .

eh, I had my reasons for not "tagging" that night. You'll see when the games over :P

[Sareln]

eh, I had my reasons for not "tagging" that night. You'll see when the games over :P

I'll take your word for it now. :neenernee

[Jkaen]

Question for the lurkers, Bigger said that that 4 people had fake IDs, 2 were Lewwyn and Zak, who do we think the other 2 are?

[Sareln]

Who is both alive and unscanned by Bob?

[Gaspar]

The reason this game feels like scum win is because he lurker thread is far more interesting than the live one.

[Injera]

Question for the lurkers, Bigger said that that 4 people had fake IDs, 2 were Lewwyn and Zak, who do we think the other 2 are?

When did Bigger say this? I must have missed it.