We just want the gold and copper sites before heading north anyway so taking the NAP makes sense.
Niccolò Machiavelli's Thread
|
Ok, I guess we will interpret those provisions as expiring along with the NAP on turn 70, then. In that case, I think it's a good deal.
If you know what I mean.
Sent this:
Quote:Accepted! Um...just to be clear w.r.t. #1, its no cities in the neutral zone for either team, no cities east of the neutral zone for you and no cities west of the neutral zone for us :-). As CRE, we have the edge on resources in the neutral zone anyway. Darrell
I found I have this picture sitting around:
![]() Edit: But "You chose unwisely" in some form is probably more appropriate.
...wounding her only makes her more dangerous!
![]() It's More Fun to be Jack of All Trades than Master of One. zakalwe Wrote:What's the message we want to send? You morons - throwing the game to Gillette ![]() |