WW16: The Outlaws and The Olives

[Ichabod]

I protected Meiz night 6. Why is this relevant?

He was the one tha asked about why I didn't protect Injera on night 6, which was what, incidentally, made me able to protects Novice twice.

These statements appear to contradict each other; that's why I brought it up.

I can't understand what you mean.

[Gaspar]

Ok, in fairness I am also now thoroughly confused.

[pindicator]

He was the one tha asked about why I didn't protect Injera on night 6, which was what, incidentally, made me able to protects Novice twice.

I should have bolded the relevant part before.

My point is that how would not protecting injera on night 6 mean Ichabod was able to protect novice twice, when he earlier said he had protected Meiz that night. It appears to be a contradiction.

I can spell it out further if you want me to, but I'm hoping to get input from people I have more faith in as being villagers.

[Twinkletoes89]

My only guess is that he can only 'save' someone so many times, and that by not saving Injera, he had enough goes left to protect novice twice.

Other than that - no clue!

[Ichabod]

He was the one tha asked about why I didn't protect Injera on night 6, which was what, incidentally, made me able to protects Novice twice.

I should have bolded the relevant part before.

My point is that how would not protecting injera on night 6 mean Ichabod was able to protect novice twice, when he earlier said he had protected Meiz that night. It appears to be a contradiction.

I can spell it out further if you want me to, but I'm hoping to get input from people I have more faith in as being villagers.

You think I'm lying about my role?

[pindicator]

You think I'm lying about my role?

I would like you to clear up the contradiction.

@Novice - do you think it would be a good idea for Ichabod to share his role name?

[Ichabod]

You think I'm lying about my role?

I would like you to clear up the contradiction.

@Novice - do you think it would be a good idea for Ichabod to share his role name?

What contradiction are you talking about?

[Ichabod]

By the way, village, since we reached a critically low number of players, i think it's best if we make a pre-vote and reach a consensus before voting, than everyone votes for the same player. There's a big chance tomorrow will be something like 6/3, so the Mafia can easily sway the votes their way, if needed.

[pindicator]

He was the one tha asked about why I didn't protect Injera on night 6, which was what, incidentally, made me able to protects Novice twice.

So my understanding is that this sentence is saying that because you didn't protect Injera on night 6, that means you had an extra charge to protect novice on night 8. But how is this a valid point if you protected meiz on night 6? That's what I mean by contradiction.

[Jkaen]

I have never seen the point of prevotes, all it does is mean those with less accomodating access times have even less chance to influence events