Are you, in fact, a pregnant lady who lives in the apartment next door to Superdeath's parents? - Commodore

Create an account  

 
PBEM 45 Vets Tech Thread

Also agree with Ichabod that I'd prefer to not use a mod
Reply

(October 21st, 2012, 15:18)Catwalk Wrote:
I like pindicator's idea, would like to humbly suggest an expansion:

6 points: FIN
5 points: EXP
4 points: CRE, SPI
3 points: PHI, ORG, IND
2 points: CHA, IMP
1 point: AGG
0 points: PRO

Come up with similar rankings for civs, should be determined by mapmaker and lurkers. Double reverse snake pick as discussed. Point total for leader and civ may not exceed 9. For each unused point, maybe give the player some gold?
(October 21st, 2012, 16:45)pindicator Wrote:
So Rego cornered me on gmail chat and we hashed out a proposal for restricting leaders & civs:

* You can pick one of FIN, EXP, ORG, India, Inca
* If you pick one of the above, then you cannot pick SPI, PHI, IND, CRE, dutch, viking

Thoughts?
Too restrictive on the top-end stuff? Anything we left out?
Scooter will be back tomorrow so he will also want to input on it, but we can refine as much as possible until then
Which way are we heading re restrictions? I strongly prefer Catwalk's suggestion as it leaves all options on the table but at a cost.
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.

(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread.
Reply

(October 21st, 2012, 17:09)Ichabod Wrote: Regarding Ruff proposal, I wouldn't care that much about using a mod. But I think it's too much of a hassle
(October 21st, 2012, 22:34)scooter Wrote: Also, prefer to avoid a mod here.
(October 22nd, 2012, 09:01)regoarrarr Wrote: Also agree with Ichabod that I'd prefer to not use a mod
Ok - noted. If I really want a particular leader for storyboarding purposes, I will just have to pick that leader.

I'll also submit my flag, color request to Commodore.
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.

(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread.
Reply

(October 22nd, 2012, 09:06)Ruff_Hi Wrote:
(October 21st, 2012, 15:18)Catwalk Wrote:
I like pindicator's idea, would like to humbly suggest an expansion:

6 points: FIN
5 points: EXP
4 points: CRE, SPI
3 points: PHI, ORG, IND
2 points: CHA, IMP
1 point: AGG
0 points: PRO

Come up with similar rankings for civs, should be determined by mapmaker and lurkers. Double reverse snake pick as discussed. Point total for leader and civ may not exceed 9. For each unused point, maybe give the player some gold?
(October 21st, 2012, 16:45)pindicator Wrote:
So Rego cornered me on gmail chat and we hashed out a proposal for restricting leaders & civs:

* You can pick one of FIN, EXP, ORG, India, Inca
* If you pick one of the above, then you cannot pick SPI, PHI, IND, CRE, dutch, viking

Thoughts?
Too restrictive on the top-end stuff? Anything we left out?
Scooter will be back tomorrow so he will also want to input on it, but we can refine as much as possible until then
Which way are we heading re restrictions? I strongly prefer Catwalk's suggestion as it leaves all options on the table but at a cost.


I think we can trim our restrictions down a little. But Catwalk is seriously undervaluing ORG for a toroid water-heavy map, IMO. I'd take Mehmed or Darius in an instant with his proposal.
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Reply

I'd be okay if the mapmaker and/or a group of friendly (knowledgeable) lurkers wanted to come up with such a list, but until I see such a list, I think we're on our own to come up with any restrictions we want.
Reply

ORG needs to be given more points.

On the civ side, what about ...

Vikings, Dutch: 3
India, Inca: 2
Rome: 1
Others: 0
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.

(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread.
Reply

We are getting more complicated; I was hoping to keep the ban list simple and short smile

Actually, I was even thinking of simplifying it further, but I would like to hear scooter weigh in on what the latest proposal is.

If there's a lot of support for a point-based system, I can put a proposal together
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Reply

I liked Pindicator/Rego suggestion. I was thinking of what to pick under those restrictions and I was coming up with loads of interesting choices. This makes me think that the proposal is a succesful one (I was thinking about a lot of not-that-common picks).
Reply

Pindicator asked for my opinion on setup rules, so here's something I believe is pretty fair. I realize it's on the complex end.

You can have 5 points.

4: FIN
3: EXP, ORG, India, Inca
2: SPI, IND, CRE, Vikings, Dutch
1: PHI, Holy Rome, All other Agriculture civs
0: IMP, CHA, AGG, PRO, All other civs

Note, if you guys are banning some early wonders, IND should drop to 1.
Reply

Thanks Seven. Nice to see at least some similarities to what I floated to you as an idea smile

+1 for using this
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Reply



Forum Jump: