Also agree with Ichabod that I'd prefer to not use a mod
PBEM 45 Vets Tech Thread
|
(October 21st, 2012, 15:18)Catwalk Wrote: (October 21st, 2012, 16:45)pindicator Wrote:Which way are we heading re restrictions? I strongly prefer Catwalk's suggestion as it leaves all options on the table but at a cost.
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.
(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread. (October 21st, 2012, 17:09)Ichabod Wrote: Regarding Ruff proposal, I wouldn't care that much about using a mod. But I think it's too much of a hassle (October 21st, 2012, 22:34)scooter Wrote: Also, prefer to avoid a mod here. (October 22nd, 2012, 09:01)regoarrarr Wrote: Also agree with Ichabod that I'd prefer to not use a modOk - noted. If I really want a particular leader for storyboarding purposes, I will just have to pick that leader. I'll also submit my flag, color request to Commodore.
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.
(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread. (October 22nd, 2012, 09:06)Ruff_Hi Wrote:(October 21st, 2012, 15:18)Catwalk Wrote: I think we can trim our restrictions down a little. But Catwalk is seriously undervaluing ORG for a toroid water-heavy map, IMO. I'd take Mehmed or Darius in an instant with his proposal.
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
I'd be okay if the mapmaker and/or a group of friendly (knowledgeable) lurkers wanted to come up with such a list, but until I see such a list, I think we're on our own to come up with any restrictions we want.
ORG needs to be given more points.
On the civ side, what about ... Vikings, Dutch: 3 India, Inca: 2 Rome: 1 Others: 0
I have finally decided to put down some cash and register a website. It is www.ruffhi.com. Now I remain free to move the hosting options without having to change the name of the site.
(October 22nd, 2014, 10:52)Caledorn Wrote: And ruff is officially banned from playing in my games as a reward for ruining my big surprise by posting silly and correct theories in the PB18 tech thread.
We are getting more complicated; I was hoping to keep the ban list simple and short
![]() Actually, I was even thinking of simplifying it further, but I would like to hear scooter weigh in on what the latest proposal is. If there's a lot of support for a point-based system, I can put a proposal together
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
I liked Pindicator/Rego suggestion. I was thinking of what to pick under those restrictions and I was coming up with loads of interesting choices. This makes me think that the proposal is a succesful one (I was thinking about a lot of not-that-common picks).
Pindicator asked for my opinion on setup rules, so here's something I believe is pretty fair. I realize it's on the complex end.
You can have 5 points. 4: FIN 3: EXP, ORG, India, Inca 2: SPI, IND, CRE, Vikings, Dutch 1: PHI, Holy Rome, All other Agriculture civs 0: IMP, CHA, AGG, PRO, All other civs Note, if you guys are banning some early wonders, IND should drop to 1. |