For everyone that may be questioning my vote on TT89, it was because last game ended with him calling the whole village useless and incompetent and similar things. So, his first post here with a check up and a joke seemed a little too "happy", maybe friendly is a better word.
So I voted without giving any comments to wait for his next post. His next post was: "This looks good/bad, but it could also be good/bad". You know, those comments that really don't go any directions. And, most importantly, he completely ignored my random/useless/without reasoning vote.
So, I think a good place to start is keeping my vote on Twinkletoes89.
(November 12th, 2012, 00:48)Twinkletoes89 Wrote: As always, too little to go on for me to put my vote anywhere, but a couple of thoughts so far.
Coco did go defensive a bit quickly, which is pinging my scumdar, but it could very easily be first game paranoia - so its not really enough to read one way or the other.
The Brick post looked odd to me, seemed to be almost trying too hard to seem pro-town so early by asking how we get to making serious votes after the almost obligatory unserious start. Nudges a little scummy but not enough either.
Hopefully the further reactions of these two and the reactions of others to them might be more revealing
Is what:
(November 12th, 2012, 04:32)Ichabod Wrote: For everyone that may be questioning my vote on TT89, it was because last game ended with him calling the whole village useless and incompetent and similar things. So, his first post here with a check up and a joke seemed a little too "happy", maybe friendly is a better word.
So I voted without giving any comments to wait for his next post. His next post was: "This looks good/bad, but it could also be good/bad". You know, those comments that really don't go any directions. And, most importantly, he completely ignored my random/useless/without reasoning vote.
So, I think a good place to start is keeping my vote on Twinkletoes89.
means. I'm also good with moving on to Twinkletoes89.
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
@Pindicator. I never said that's why I'm voting Coco, but it's the reason I unvoted Q. Of course, it doesn't hurt to vote with people you think are town, either.
What's this thing you've got going with Azza? Did you two fall out last game or something?
(November 12th, 2012, 00:48)Twinkletoes89 Wrote: As always, too little to go on for me to put my vote anywhere, but a couple of thoughts so far.
Coco did go defensive a bit quickly, which is pinging my scumdar, but it could very easily be first game paranoia - so its not really enough to read one way or the other.
The Brick post looked odd to me, seemed to be almost trying too hard to seem pro-town so early by asking how we get to making serious votes after the almost obligatory unserious start. Nudges a little scummy but not enough either.
Hopefully the further reactions of these two and the reactions of others to them might be more revealing
Is what:
(November 12th, 2012, 04:32)Ichabod Wrote: For everyone that may be questioning my vote on TT89, it was because last game ended with him calling the whole village useless and incompetent and similar things. So, his first post here with a check up and a joke seemed a little too "happy", maybe friendly is a better word.
So I voted without giving any comments to wait for his next post. His next post was: "This looks good/bad, but it could also be good/bad". You know, those comments that really don't go any directions. And, most importantly, he completely ignored my random/useless/without reasoning vote.
So, I think a good place to start is keeping my vote on Twinkletoes89.
means. I'm also good with moving on to Twinkletoes89.
Why you gotta be stealing my thunder like that Lewwyn? Twinkletoes89
(November 12th, 2012, 00:48)Twinkletoes89 Wrote: As always, too little to go on for me to put my vote anywhere, but a couple of thoughts so far.
Coco did go defensive a bit quickly, which is pinging my scumdar, but it could very easily be first game paranoia - so its not really enough to read one way or the other.
The Brick post looked odd to me, seemed to be almost trying too hard to seem pro-town so early by asking how we get to making serious votes after the almost obligatory unserious start. Nudges a little scummy but not enough either.
Hopefully the further reactions of these two and the reactions of others to them might be more revealing
Is what:
(November 12th, 2012, 04:32)Ichabod Wrote: For everyone that may be questioning my vote on TT89, it was because last game ended with him calling the whole village useless and incompetent and similar things. So, his first post here with a check up and a joke seemed a little too "happy", maybe friendly is a better word.
So I voted without giving any comments to wait for his next post. His next post was: "This looks good/bad, but it could also be good/bad". You know, those comments that really don't go any directions. And, most importantly, he completely ignored my random/useless/without reasoning vote.
So, I think a good place to start is keeping my vote on Twinkletoes89.
means. I'm also good with moving on to Twinkletoes89.
Lewwyn, I don't think you are supposed to be playing this game... At least you are not in the player list. Is there a mistake somewhere?
... and that d was just itching to become a g.
Why you gotta be stealing my thunder like that Lewwyn?