(November 16th, 2012, 02:17)thestick Wrote: What happened to the ability to search for psots by user?
On Mattimeo, I don't think that he'd be careless enough to launch such a faulty case on Tasunke if he was a wolf. Heh, people who are acting very weird are looking village to me
On Lewwyn, the whole 'I can't think of anything' thing sounded like myself from 15, but Lewwyn isn't supposed to remind me of myself.
(November 15th, 2012, 23:58)Lewwyn Wrote: Look, you only have one game to get a wolf baseline from me. There is no history. But let me tell you. I was in favor of killing off Bigger when I was a wolf. I was fine with the Zak kill but Bigger was my choice. Why? because I think he's more dangerous than Zak. If anything last game should tell you that I have a penchant for getting rid of Bigger. And the fact that I didn't take the opportunity to vote for Bigger yesterday should be a village tell. I respect Bigger's game a lot more than most people here. I think he's dangerous. But I also started to think he was innocent yesterday and I kept my vote on Brick who I believed to be scum.
Hang on, 'You should disregard my wolf play from last game, but my wolf play from last game indicates that I'm villager this game.' Wha? Lewwyn
BTW, I agree with Lewwyn that this post by Thestick is weak. It feels more like petty word twisting than a genuine suspicion.
To get the real name of scum isn't that hard. So I'm quite sure scum won't claim that.(*) But I do doubt the assumption that you can tell the power of a 'not-scum-name'.
*) Of course uberfish beeing uberfish he will have given at least one scummish name to a townie and vice versa.
In short for me the name anybody claims means nothing thats why I don't get all those fuss.
(November 16th, 2012, 04:52)zakalwe Wrote: But while I'm on the topic: Mattimeo Lewwyn Sareln Mardoc
Four off-line players voting for Brick, who ended up with an extra vote that nobody claims responsibility for. Mattimeo and Lewwyn deny that they're double-voters. I think I'd like all four of you to comment explicitly on what you think about the hidden vote and what it might mean.
Hell, so much for trying to keep power roles vague, keep the scum guessing. This isn't worth the time and energy you all are spending on the question. And I suppose it'll be obvious soon enough.
It's mine. I'm a double voter - I have the ear of the king. I can't turn it off, it's always cast the same as my public vote, and frankly given my record, I'm probably the worst person to have rolled this ability. Although I admit it's the reason I've been sneaking in time at work, my mistakes cost extra this game.
Hypothetically, I could probably get rid of it by breaking a rule and being punished, but I don't think that I want to use rules tactically like that. Plus of course if I were Uberfish and saw a player trying to game the system, I'd simply modkill that player.
Now, do you suppose you could all come back from trying to unravel the meta, and instead spend your brainpower on scumhunting?
This isn't worth the time and energy you all are spending on the question. And I suppose it'll be obvious soon enough.
