'Parking vote on Lewwyn' was simply because I didn't have time to change it between sleeping, preparing for the day, then working. This deadline's terrible for me on weekdays.
@Lewwyn Sure thing.
Rowain seems to be pretty aggressive in his defence, as well as a bit... pointed? It doesn't seem like something a scum would do, scum would probably back off and hide.
coco. QT314 that zak pulled up is interesting, sounds like coco's stalling for time.
(November 18th, 2012, 01:27)Jkaen Wrote: also you have taken it as fact that Brick was killed by scum, which given night 2's results seems far from a given
??? How so? If there are 2 groups of traitors they very well have no problem to kill each other too. And both novice and Serdoa are good night-kill choices.
(November 18th, 2012, 01:27)Jkaen Wrote: Just to head back to this, Lewwyns theory fell apart because it would need TT, Rowain and Serdoa to be wolves all together as far as I understand... well 1 down...
Have you thought this through in any way?
(November 18th, 2012, 02:14)Jkaen Wrote: I dont see why Loki (with his newbie protection) would be easier mislynched that Lewwyn. Plus I think only you see the 'mass of misinterpretations'
We are not talking about day 1 alone. Lewwyn is proteected during the first 2-3 days even if he does nothing at all (best example last game) because everyone knows he is best later on and (usually) delivers good reads then. Please Jkaen don't disregard things only because I'm posting them. And abot the misinterpretations : show me were I was making a huge fuss about my (denied) Bigger-vote. Afterall you seem to believbe that Lewwyn got that right.
(November 18th, 2012, 02:25)thestick Wrote: Rowain seems to be pretty aggressive in his defence, as well as a bit... pointed? It doesn't seem like something a scum would do, scum would probably back off and hide.
Ok given the background to the game, I can certainly see 2 scum factions as a possibility, but uberfish has been planning this a long time and can be pretty creative, I dont like how certain people have been about first the extra vote definetly being scum, now it seems there is 2 scum groups. Seems we are closing minds to other options.
As for Lewwyns link, I was waiting to see how he thought the serdoa death affected things, not worked through it too much as early linking 3 scum seems unlikely, did find it worth noting thoguh.
Lewwyn is expected to up his game on day 3. A newbie with even nominal participation who doesnt make a stupid blunder (which Loki shouldnt have done) would likely be given the same protection.
'mass of interpretations not to say lies' I hardly think bringing that point up qualifies as 'masses' of mis-interpretations. A big deal was made about your misvote, its fairly understandable to link that big fuss to you in somebodys mind
(November 18th, 2012, 02:25)thestick Wrote: Rowain seems to be pretty aggressive in his defence, as well as a bit... pointed? It doesn't seem like something a scum would do, scum would probably back off and hide.
My thought exactly. If Rowain backed off and hid then I would be voting for him straight away, aggressive defense is pretty much standard behaviour no matter what he has rolled
(November 18th, 2012, 01:52)Jkaen Wrote: So, given the results and a bit of time to clear your head, what do you think now of this connection?
yea, clearly Twinkletoes wasn't convinced of Mattimeo's guilt. Was that because of a cheat sheet?
His defense of novice (airc) could go either way, as survivor sounds like 1 or 2 players with a flexible win condition rather than a faction.
Not sure what to make of the traitor kill. I admit earlier I was certain there had to be 2 factions, but I am no longer entirely convinced. Therefore I see the possibility of a traitor faction plus an SK vig (maybe a pro-town SK?).
Although, tbh, as far as SK's go, hard to say where their loyalty/alignment really is.
(November 17th, 2012, 21:09)pindicator Wrote: Anyway, I will bet my lordship that...
I missed this the first time round, just spotted it while tallying votes. Was this a claim at all? As that phrase immediately makes me think of 1 character...
Even if its not the connection I am making (want to see if people draw the same conclusion other than me) being male rules out a host of people
(November 18th, 2012, 02:19)Jkaen Wrote: Ok, so the case on coco from what I understand if a policy lynch, then added on to people trawling his posts and reviewing them with observational bias. Unless I missed a case here I cannot get on board with that.
Would be interested in Novice's role made him so keen to know about Rowains name claim, or if it was unrelated.
Lewwyn I feel came out of yesterday looking quite villager like, and to my surprise given the posts I quoted back for looking suspicious, I feel that I have disagreed with far too much zakalwe has posted this game.
I have also disagreed greatly with Rowain, but I expect to do that
I was wondering if anyone would do this.
Zakalwe
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
