WW17: Lurker Thread

[Bigger]

Well tough luck, Bigger. Someone needs to hang, and I did the best I could to hang scum, all game long. I don't see why I deserve a bigger share of the blame than anyone else.

you're not getting one, you're just the first one to engage me

[zakalwe]

We could have made a great scum hunting team though, as we really were on the same wavelength, earlier. So I am sorry for that lost opportunity.

Sorry for being defensive, but I catch enough flak as is in these games, IMHO.

I'm getting very tired of the "where are the village leaders" bullshit that pops up every time I make it to day 3.

[uberfish]

WW10 had a weakened version of the majority lynch (Lynch happens if a player has 50 % or more at the 24hours mark) and it helped the wolves win too. One big weakness for example is that it can rob a player his defense. If the push happens during his offline-cycle (sleep, travel what ever) he is dead without a chance to make a roleclaim to save himself or answer the accusations.

Well people shouldn't be casting the lynch vote without waiting for the lynch target to defend, and the maximum length of day would probably be longer than 2.

The WW10 hybrid system probably wasn't a good compromise in hindsight, should be one way or the other

[novice]

Mardoc (5) - Azza Pindicator Qqqqqq Tasunke Zakalwe
Azza (1) - Qgqqqqq

NOt voting - Mardoc

First Q is probably Lewwyn.

[novice]

BTW Zak, you need to freshen up your pattern recognition, Uberfish always lists voters alphabetically.

[zakalwe]

Cool, I still get to vote?

[zakalwe]

BTW Zak, you need to freshen up your pattern recognition, Uberfish always lists voters alphabetically.

Yeah, what I meant to say is that he compiles tallies by throwing darts at the player list.

[uberfish]

BTW Zak, you need to freshen up your pattern recognition, Uberfish always lists voters alphabetically.

Wow that vote count really sucked.

But yes, I list them alphabetically to try and avoid stupid metagaming based on what order the votes are listed in

Given how many mistakes I make on the vote counts I'm not sure I needed to worry that much about being metagamed though

[pling]

Given how many mistakes I make on the vote counts I'm not sure I needed to worry that much about being metagamed though

Nah, WW players can metagame everything even and especially when told it's not going to reveal anything ...

[Bigger]

We could have made a great scum hunting team though, as we really were on the same wavelength, earlier. So I am sorry for that lost opportunity.

Sorry for being defensive, but I catch enough flak as is in these games, IMHO.

I'm getting very tired of the "where are the village leaders" bullshit that pops up every time I make it to day 3.

we've been on the same wavelength day 1 every game that we were both villagers. Its one (of several) ways that I read you, tbh, and its why the only game I tried to lynch you was ww12 (where I was village and you were scum). You've always read me innocent initially, but end up changing your mind eventually .

And you don't need to be defensive, I don't blame you as much as it seems. I just realized that 3 of the 5 people that voted for me were scum, though - and thats assuming Pindicator is innocent. And Pindicator's vote was mostly defensive anyway. (I consider novice's role scum, since he's useless to the village). So I don't have many people to bitch at this time, I guess. I did call out thestick and Rowain, and would be cursing a storm at TT if he had ended up being innocent .