WW 18 Siege of the Dragon! (Game Thread)

[Serdoa]

I don't like Serdoa so far, either, even though I haven't said anything about it yet. I'm giving Mattimeo a town point for sharing the sentiment. Same perspective, and all that.

I want to lynch one of the Q voters. Maybe even the wagon driver.

Serdoa

Oh, and last point. When you are answering all the questions I asked in my last post, answer me this one as well: Why the fuck are you voting for Mattimeo, getting NO response at all to your accusations and suddenly decide that you go from not trusting him to voting because of what he wrote? I didn't realize it in my last post, but it is really comical how you voted him, stating that he should explain himself better. And then he does not once explain himself at all, just posts that he thinks I feel like last game and suddenly you vote for me. Honestly?

[Qgqqqqq]

Also like to hear more form Bigger.

[Serdoa]

Serdoa, could you respond to my responses?
I'd like to hear your thoughtss on the case now that i'vee refuted it.

I'm not seeing it refuted, but honestly, half of your posts are making no sense for me due to the immense amount of typing errors and incoherent sentences, so I might very well not even have read it. Yes, I know, the phone, but why has that to be my problem? Why do I need to invest absurd amounts of time to figure out what you might have meant? Call me old fashioned but there is something called courtesy. And obviously you are able to type correctly (or remotely so) even on your phone, so it is not a language barrier. You just decided that you don't want to invest the time necessary to correct the errors - and again, why should I invest in that case the time to decipher it?

[Qgqqqqq]

WTF?
It takes me forever to type them out as it is, no thats not your problem, but have you heard of something called courtesy?
If you can't be bothered responding to a bunch of posts directed specificaly at you and then proceed to be rude about it, I'm not going to bother reading yours.
Serdoa

[Qgqqqqq]

If you're not seeing it refuted thats because your case sucked anyway.

Still I took the time to respond to each of the points you made, maybe you could try deigning me with the same.

[Serdoa]

I really shouldn't have invested the time to read this...

p78 (only caught up to here)
lol what?
I explained its uselessness earliep, b/c its D1 and my first vote - and therefore obviously useful b/c nothings going to happen b/c ofit

It may not be how you play but I never intend to stay on a joke vote.

And I explained already that the vote was not useless. Thats what all this discussion is about, that you call a vote useless (and therefore easy to separate yourself from it) that clearly isn't.

I tried to engage with azza - WTF??
Im online, at a computer for 1ce a bit bored because noones ever online when i am, and az posts.
So i respond. (just like i did to MJW, WB et al)
btw this is a weaknes of my play, that i normally focus on those posts more rec

You vote Azza - useless and as a joke which you don't intend to keep. Azza calls you on that vote because it puts him on top. You respond by calling him, and I quote here: "To me that smacks of wolf focusing on an easy mislynch". Yeah, I would call that engaging with him. To be exact, you stated outright that you believe he is a wolf and voted MJW (and not you) in hopes of an easy mislynch. You first put him on top, you then call him a wolf - and now you explain that you just responded to him because you were bored. Yeah, ok...

[uberfish]

re: novice: since the wagon mostly disbanded, I voted azza mainly to start a bandwagon and see how people reacted. Azza's a good target for pressure because he has played the same lurky style both as village and scum in the 2 games he's played and it's hard to read. I expect that most of the village would think the same way due to what happened in 17.

Note that I still think Q's vote on me is scummy due to the reasoning outlined above. I expected people voting for azza to have a similar mindset that azza votes were a good early move. If Q had voted someone else then I could understand attacking me.

I'm ok with waterbat's explanation of his vote.

Ichabod feels off and his vote for Pind over the mayor vote seemed rather contrived. If I were to switch it'd probably be there. Not buying the case against serdoa, he seems to be playing in his usual style.

[Serdoa]

WTF?
It takes me forever to type them out as it is, no thats not your problem, but have you heard of something called courtesy?
If you can't be bothered responding to a bunch of posts directed specificaly at you and then proceed to be rude about it, I'm not going to bother reading yours.
Serdoa

9 minutes and you had to read my post first. Funny how you can type without even one typing-error as soon as you are called on it, even with coloring.

[Qgqqqqq]

And I explained why I thought you were wrong.
The uselessness or otherwise is a matter of opinion - if you honestly thought everyone was going to stay on Azza till lynchtime then, well

My point on Azza was thaat he was focussing in on me to the exclusion of the other 4 people who were voting for him.
Actually I was saying that it was suspicious because it felt like he was setting me (not MJW) up for a mislynch, by focussing on the person voting for him that might be easiest mislynched (i.e. me).

I'm not saying I responded solely because I was bored, simply that is one of the reasons I felt I responded to him (or engaged as you would have us believe).

Honestly your just reading so much into so little - possibly on purpose?

[Qgqqqqq]

I'm on a computer now you idiot. (the idiot is not for not knowing that, it's because you are being insulting).
And yes I read your post first...(maybe try the same???)