WW 18 Siege of the Dragon! (Game Thread)

[Qgqqqqq]

serdoa ive been basically saying "i disagree with you on the suspisciosness ofuseless lets talk about x" for 12 hours now but you wont SHUT UP about it.
serdoa does your role say you have to troll everyone this game, or just me? i freely admit i suck at this game but today ive been playing WAY better then you. My dastardly plan of not playing, really?
whats presented here doesnt represent what youve done? your preaching to the choir here, youve been misrepresenting people all day, from ignoring everything

[Qgqqqqq]

i say to pretending people cant understand your posts.
Noones making a fucking case up, wd're just pointing out facts any blind man and his dog can see.
if nothing else youve made two posts since zak asked aquestion, in one showing youd seen it and still havent responded.

[Qgqqqqq]

im so pissed right now its not healthy.
sleep and talk more when i feel less like throwing you out a window

[slowcheetah]

slowcheetah, you are reminding me a lot of your WW15 self so far. Care to contribute a little?

Not yet, travelling/packing for home. Should be around for a few hours before lynchtime where I'll digest and comment.

Selrahc, I read your challenge and am going to coward out. In this game a vote is all I have, and I don't want to risk that. I'd rather just periodically moon you and run away before you can catch up :P.

[Serdoa]

@zak, Q

I've answered all your questions. I answered even your barely understandable phone-posts Q and explained why they do actually not refute my case. I also didn't focus on my reasoning of your case. Stop pretending that, it did not happen. You are accusing me since nearly 10 pages now because of my starting post. Thats it. Thats why we talk about it. I've gone trough the thread and till you guys started I actually have once more posted about Q. And that was a direct answer to a post made by him which was not really helping his case imo. Nothing more. Everything else was started by you - and yet you use that to paint me as pushing Q.

Q himself also expects that I somehow take back my case. I won't. I still don't see why you would call a vote useless that isn't useless (and zak, the argument that we wouldn't talk about it if he hadn't called it useless is not making sense. "Oh, if he hadn't killed someone, we wouldn't talk about him killing people".. yeah, right, we wouldn't. What does that tell us?). Anyhow, there is more to it than that, but as I said before, I don't see it as a waterproof-case at all. I just pointed out that this behaviour was suspicious to me. Thats it.

So please, you two, show me where I focussed on Q. Show me were I pushed him? The only ones pushing are you two.

Anyhow, what is asked now of me? That I go around and look for suspects? I've done that already, despite all the questioning and trying to derail the thread by you guys. And I posted it, go back and read. I had to defend since several pages against your accusations and I still have delivered more than you guys up to now. Whom do you find suspicious apart from me? Why?

Oh wait, zak told us already. All Q-voters. Isn't it funny that you guys jump at me because all my suspicions are about people defending Q but yet zak jumping at all people voting for him is totally understandable? Doesn't make sense.

In fact, all your play makes no sense zak.

zakalwe

[zakalwe]

(and zak, the argument that we wouldn't talk about it if he hadn't called it useless is not making sense. "Oh, if he hadn't killed someone, we wouldn't talk about him killing people".. yeah, right, we wouldn't. What does that tell us?)

You said that your case didn't revolve around the word "useless", and I argued that it did, because if you take away that word, Q's post would apparently be fine. If you want to compare using the word "useless" with killing someone, then fine, but then you are in fact arguing that the word is a smoking gun that your case revolves around.

I'll need to digest the rest before responding further. I can't understand why you are reacting the way you are.

[waterbat]

concerning post 196, what am i being asked Qgqqqqq? can't follow 90% of your posts.

[waterbat]

Ok - took me 4 hours to completely re-write the post scraper- im still not happy with it, but it does the job in a much better fashion than the old one.

new features:
you can update it your damn self
should be dynamic for future games - just reset the thread ID, and its done.
only grabs each page of posts 1 time per update (sorts the posts into player buckets)

removed features:
no "all" link for all posts

open items:
still need to fix some of the intra-site links so avatars and buttons work. probably do this for next game.
not sure at what point the # of posts will exceed the allowed process time. im guessing this is somewhere arround 3000 posts. but im not sure. have wys of dealing with this, but dont have time to do it now

URL:

http://www.cassidyweb.com/ww18

please dont click spam the update. the date of last update is there - so you can see if it needs it or not.

[zakalwe]

That's awesome, Waterbat.

[waterbat]

it is doubtful i will have time to post much before the deadline.

I must say that the lack of any momentum on candidates other than Qgqqqqq could be telling. The wolves could be waiting for a later move, of course. The vote is still fractured enough they could be waiting to see what shakes out.

If he's innocent, I can certainly understand why Serdoa is voting Zak. If he's not village, he's playing up the fact that he's been "wronged" for trying to contribute. Someone mentioned possible dragon/SK role for Serdoa - I can see this as well. A little more upset than normal that he is being suspected.

Both Mattimeo and Qgqqqqq - you will be gone at deadline due to your locales, correct? If so - i guess be sure to post defense before heading off.
As of now, I think day1 lynch should be between those two, but i'll admit they arent the strongest candidates ever - havent seen much else though.