December 24th, 2012, 17:24
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
I dunno ... If u do it b4 hand, one team might have no chance of winning. Unless ppl also have auction powers that can b activated during the auction
December 24th, 2012, 23:20
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
I don't think the auction game would work. it would be fairly easy to guess what different players would want. especially if you allowed them to "buy" their alignment, but not only.
I like angel vs demon & weird roles 2. I'm a little confused by the AvD setup, but I'm confident you'll get it fleshed out, and I like "new"
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
December 24th, 2012, 23:42
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
In love with the Angel vs Demon set up actually :D
(its mah fust vote)
December 25th, 2012, 00:11
Posts: 2,511
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2012
A and D, über. Or any setup that doesn't leave me alone, sad, and bitter at the end.
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
December 25th, 2012, 00:50
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
(December 24th, 2012, 23:42)Tasunke Wrote: In love with the Angel vs Demon set up actually :D
(its mah fust vote)
Or should I say my *faust* vote.
December 25th, 2012, 16:14
(This post was last modified: December 25th, 2012, 16:15 by Bigger.)
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
while we're claiming games, I am working on one that I can run after uberfish. its a role madness game where every role is 1-shot (allowing me to make some really creative and fun roles w/o having to worry about any role overpowering the game). I'll have 30-35 roles to pick from by the time I start sign-ups, so I can wait until sign-ups are closed to pick which roles to assign (more protective roles for a small game, more roles that speed the game up if its large).
I also wonder if it might be a good to ask KOP to give us a subforum within the gaming table for WW games? (like succession games have now) we already take up 60% of this forum, it will make the gaming table less cluttered, allow for easier perusing of old ww games (for lurkers and players doing research). we could also, for instance, have a thread for people signing up to host future games (a list of whose game is coming next), as well as a place for new hosts to ask for veterans to vet their games (I think a good rule for everyone that hasn't hosted a game before, maybe even 2).
What do you think?
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
December 25th, 2012, 17:09
(This post was last modified: December 25th, 2012, 17:12 by Tasunke.)
Posts: 4,421
Threads: 53
Joined: Sep 2011
I like it. Especially the list of who's game is coming up next.
I have 3 finely crafted WW set ups designed for your pleasure
December 25th, 2012, 19:38
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
(December 24th, 2012, 11:08)BRickAstley Wrote: Also, I have a question I would want to put out there as well: For easier division of threads in-game and easier reviewing of previous games, would people be interested if I moved all WW games/talk/etc into a subforum under The Gaming Table?
I like the idea for ease of reviewing, though I think threads like this and signups should remain in the main forum to continue to hopefully attract new players.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
December 25th, 2012, 20:16
Posts: 7,916
Threads: 158
Joined: Jan 2012
(December 25th, 2012, 19:38)Gaspar Wrote: (December 24th, 2012, 11:08)BRickAstley Wrote: Also, I have a question I would want to put out there as well: For easier division of threads in-game and easier reviewing of previous games, would people be interested if I moved all WW games/talk/etc into a subforum under The Gaming Table?
I like the idea for ease of reviewing, though I think threads like this and signups should remain in the main forum to continue to hopefully attract new players.
Just follow the same standard as civ games: have signal threads start in the gaming table, and then moved to the ww subforum after they start for posterity.
I can setup the subforum in the next day btw, once I have non-phone access.
December 25th, 2012, 20:44
Posts: 8,022
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2006
(December 25th, 2012, 20:16)BRickAstley Wrote: (December 25th, 2012, 19:38)Gaspar Wrote: (December 24th, 2012, 11:08)BRickAstley Wrote: Also, I have a question I would want to put out there as well: For easier division of threads in-game and easier reviewing of previous games, would people be interested if I moved all WW games/talk/etc into a subforum under The Gaming Table?
I like the idea for ease of reviewing, though I think threads like this and signups should remain in the main forum to continue to hopefully attract new players.
Just follow the same standard as civ games: have signal threads start in the gaming table, and then moved to the ww subforum after they start for posterity.
I can setup the subforum in the next day btw, once I have non-phone access.
Is there a way we can invis/limited access threads like the demogames for masons/scum/whatever which are then revealed after the game? I'd be far more likely to read the scum thread if it was here.
I've got some dirt on my shoulder, can you brush it off for me?
|