Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
Zak what's the slip? Do you mean that Tasunke is scum and had insider knowledge that scum asked Brick about the item reveal policy? because brick said that items *would* be revealed which was the opposite of tasunke's assupmtion.
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
Ryan, a (serious) question for you: Do you know what a quicktopic is?
I have to run.
Posts: 2,511
Threads: 4
Joined: Mar 2012
the links were broken because i was being unlazy and fixing the Brick as adminsitrator think and ended up breaking them all.
so now it is fixed. Also that feature request is noted
--
Best dating advice on RB: When you can't hide your unit, go in fast and hard. -- Sullla
Posts: 1,162
Threads: 18
Joined: Dec 2011
(January 4th, 2013, 13:43)zakalwe Wrote: The scum can talk together privately outside of this thread. In the old days we used email or PMs, nowadays it's a quicktopic.
Surely you knew this already?
Its how the wolves talk with each other? Or thats what I got from Zakalwe.
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
Ryan Wrote:Its how the wolves talk with each other? Or thats what I got from Zakalwe.
Correct. What I'm wondering is how you understood anything about what Tasunke was doing earlier without knowing this?
I have to run.
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
(January 4th, 2013, 17:33)uberfish Wrote: Zak what's the slip? Do you mean that Tasunke is scum and had insider knowledge that scum asked Brick about the item reveal policy? because brick said that items *would* be revealed which was the opposite of tasunke's assupmtion.
Here's his argument again:
"Lets assume that items aren't revealed. Then lets assume the scum already asked this and found out it was so. In that case, it would make perfect sense as a scum ploy. Nothing more dangerous than a fool card running amok that people thought was destroyed."
But if Novice is scum, then lynching him certainly wouldn't convince us that the fool tarot card was destroyed - unless, of course, the mod explicitly stated that it had been destroyed. So his argument makes no sense - at least not to me.
On the other hand, if Tasunke is scum, and knows that Novice is innocent, then he knows that Novice's flip would convince us that the fool card was destroyed (regardless of the item reveal policy).
So it looks like Tasunke got his wires crossed and somehow managed to argue that "This would be a great scum ploy for Novice because of this other thing that would only be true if Novice were innocent." I.e., he accidentally relied on information that he shouldn't have.
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 1,162
Threads: 18
Joined: Dec 2011
I randomly voted him because of my old ffh2 games with him . All I understood from you guys was hes a suspect for linking something wrong. I said I even felt sorry for randomly voting him. After Zak posted it made more sense to me. I dont think I posted anything about what he did except for dont trust cause he back stabbed me a lot in the past and I think you are more of a suspect.
But Zak lets say you have an item and you die while holding it during the day. I dont think the item should pass to anyone else. Unless you can pickpocket said item after he dies from his room... I dont think the item will randomly pass to someone else.
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
(January 4th, 2013, 18:02)Ryan Wrote: I randomly voted him because of my old ffh2 games with him . All I understood from you guys was hes a suspect for linking something wrong. I said I even felt sorry for randomly voting him. After Zak posted it made more sense to me. I dont think I posted anything about what he did except for dont trust cause he back stabbed me a lot in the past and I think you are more of a suspect.
Then what was this about?
(January 4th, 2013, 06:35)novice Wrote: (January 4th, 2013, 06:28)Ryan Wrote: Tas is lying. I've played with him everyday for 3 months or more . I know his American ways. I'm Egyptian with magical powers as well .
Lying about what? You being innocent?
(January 4th, 2013, 06:44)Ryan Wrote: That he's a rat .
Doesn't your last post mean that he was lying about being a rat? So you understood what he had implied by talking about his quicktopic?
I have to run.
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
(January 4th, 2013, 18:02)Ryan Wrote: But Zak lets say you have an item and you die while holding it during the day. I dont think the item should pass to anyone else. Unless you can pickpocket said item after he dies from his room... I dont think the item will randomly pass to someone else.
My understanding is that if you're lynched, any items you're holding die with you. Same if you're night-killed. And probably the same if you're mod-killed in the middle of the day, which I think would be the only way to actually die during a day in this game.
Not sure how this is relevant to what I said before, though?
Also, I'm interested in Novice's line of inquiry. (Which is really the same thing that I asked about, earlier.)
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 1,162
Threads: 18
Joined: Dec 2011
Zak *but if Novice is scum, then lynching him certainly wouldn't convince us that the fool tarot card was destroyed - unless, of course, the mod explicitly stated that it had been destroyed. So his argument makes no sense - at least not to me.*
I miss read that I thought you were questioning if the items died with you my apologizes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Novice : Saying that hes lying due to his American ways and hes a rat. I was joking -.-. How does me saying he is American increase the fact that he is a rat because he used to back stabb me when I plaied FFH with him?
|