WW 19 Game Thread - Mobster Mayhem - GAME OVER

[Qgqqqqq]

EDIT : MJW you are now copying what ser and rowain and i said about lynching Novice is the least harmfull. You are a really wierd guy. Just gonna ignore your posts from now on.

Just realized that post could be read as aimed at Qgqqqqq so I just wanted to clarify.

Sorry what?
Leaving soon and won't be back past lynchtime.
If anyone has an argument, post it now please.

[Qgqqqqq]

He means fake edit...

[Ryan]

I pointed out observations about your play - impressions I had got.
Saying I am shit is rude however.
Ive dealt with your arguments and responded to them.
Rowan argued for a novice lynch first IIRC.

Don't worry we all get annoyed and frustrated in WW. I'm sure no offence is mean at either end

Its just in my eyes , Those ideas are mine and I am not following anyone or just riding a train. Im trying to come to my own and when I keep getting bombared with these accusation its annoying to say the least and gets on my nerves when I am actually trying. I am sorry for being rude there. I wasnt mentioning the idea of against Novice. I meant the idea that Novice + the item dissapering was a nice plan. I wrote it at post 93 and i even asked about what I was thinking but nope I am just riding on peoples backs...

[novice]

I also need to point out that editing posts at all is illegal...

He didn't edit, he made a new post.

@all: I know it's not always practical from a phone etc, but if you can, quote the statement (not necessarily the whole post) you're responding to, that makes it easier to read along. At least start your post with @<person>.

[Ryan]

EDIT : MJW you are now copying what ser and rowain and i said about lynching Novice is the least harmfull. You are a really wierd guy. Just gonna ignore your posts from now on.

Just realized that post could be read as aimed at Qgqqqqq so I just wanted to clarify.

Sorry what?
Leaving soon and won't be back past lynchtime.
If anyone has an argument, post it now please.

I was writing this to MJW earlier. Then I realized that you posted before me and it could mean that I was writing this towards you. I just wanted to clarify by posting again and explaining what I meant. Guess I failed at that.

[Qgqqqqq]

Sorry but in my mind thats a horrible reason for kill, which is why I'm focusing on the rest of the argument.
You have a point there Serdoa.
Strill its better then the tasunke/selrahc trians at this point.
Besides, Tasunke claimed a role (which he hasn't mentioned since...)

[Qgqqqqq]

@novice: sorry, I know I do this a lot, its just normally right before me when I first compose.

[MJW (ya that one)]

I just don't think:

I'm still the opinion that it better to lynch a villager with the card than to lynch a villager without it.
So who has a good enough chance to be scum to outweight the risk of lynching a villager? Our back and forth has drawn too much talk so far (which makes it in itself already a good move for scum) but I think there are some names worth a closer inspection.

vs.

If the village is tottaly unsure of who the wolfs are novice is a good target as day1 is a likely mislych anyway. At least we get rid of the fool card and might even hit a wolf! If not novice is a rather "meh" target at best.

counts as copying. I'm not sure if its even the same idea...

[Qgqqqqq]

Good luck Rowain.
Sorry if village

[MJW (ya that one)]

I also need to point out that editing posts at all is illegal...

He didn't edit, he made a new post.

You're right...