Wait, maybe Azza was jailed? How do you know that isn't the case, Azza? Would Bigger be able to jail someone before dying?
If you know what I mean.
|
WW 19 Game Thread - Mobster Mayhem - GAME OVER
|
(January 7th, 2013, 03:45)zakalwe Wrote: To elaborate, the only way Azza is telling the truth and Tasunke isn't lying is if there is some mystery item that blocked Azza. Because Tasunke wasn't jailed, if he's telling the truth about shooting Bigger. Azza could've been jailed. No idea why though.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
(January 7th, 2013, 03:47)zakalwe Wrote: Wait, maybe Azza was jailed? How do you know that isn't the case, Azza? Would Bigger be able to jail someone before dying? My result PM was "you found nothing to steal". Not that I was blocked, or that it failed, or whatever. It specifically states that there was no item for me to steal. So unless "you found nothing to steal" means that I was jailed? But that doesn't make sense to me. So I'm pretty confident I wasn't jailed. (January 7th, 2013, 03:47)zakalwe Wrote: Wait, maybe Azza was jailed? How do you know that isn't the case, Azza? Would Bigger be able to jail someone before dying? Azza said Brick's PM said "there is nothing to steal". Unless Brick acted like a-hole he would have said "no result" if azza was roleblocked.
Night Order of Operations:
1. Padlock & Key 2. Other Item Usage 3. Lockpick & Gloves 4. Night Kill 5. Item Passes Yeah, looks like Azza could have been jailed even if Bigger died. Brick, can you confirm? Can the Padlock be used successfully on the night that its holder is killed? Cross-posting. Yes, that seems like a "bastard" reply to give if you were jailed.
If you know what I mean.
@Qgqqqq
For your question why the real vig does not come forward: Because it is better to not reveal before D3 so that he can pass on the gun first. This is not the same for Tasunke. If he is the Vig, he had to claim if he didn't want to get lynched today. Now, thinking about this: a) Tasunke says the truth If we lynch him today, we lose the gun and a villager b) Azza says the truth If we lynch him today, we lose the lockpick and a villager Normally, I would vote Azza in this case, because without knowing who says the truth (giving them both equal chances of being scum or villager) it comes down to which item I'd rather lose. And I would rather lose the lockpick than the gun. But I had a village-lean on Azza after Day 1 and a strong scum-lean on Tasunke. Therefore Tasunke
It's moot now, since Tasunke's claim appears to be a lie, but Pindicator, I would totally have lynched Tasunke unless he claimed vig.
(January 6th, 2013, 20:02)Merovech Wrote: I think a lot of things revolve around uberfish's identity... Really? Why is that? @Serdoa, I already quoted the rule clarification by Brick once that proves my innocence, assuming you're innocent. Post 101 IIRC. (January 7th, 2013, 01:02)waterbat Wrote: well, i look bad because i was last one to jump on before the claim? Also kind of moot now, but I agree with Waterbat, I don't see how his Tasunke vote made him look bad. He was encouraging Tasunke to hurry up and claim, just as I told him to. (January 7th, 2013, 02:50)MJW (ya that one) Wrote: Biggest post #599 worth looking at. If it is real its such a strange topic for ryan to break the rules and PM someone. Also the word "post" is very strange. I had the same thought this morning. Here's the post MJW's talking about: (January 6th, 2013, 13:14)Bigger Wrote: also, in the spirit of full disclosure. I got a pm from Ryan today asking me if it was possible to suicide yourself. I told him he needs to ask Brick this, and that it was against the rules for us to pm privately. he responded with a "my bad, didn't know" post. Ryan, why did you choose Bigger as the person to ask this?
I have to run.
|
