WW 19 Game Thread - Mobster Mayhem - GAME OVER

[MJW (ya that one)]

hhmmmm its 4-3-2-2-2-2 so anything can happen in the voting. I'm pretty sure that selrahc won't get lyched today as novice agrees with his point. Yay... It's very strange that he has not attacked anyone or voted anyone less than 3 hours before the deadline.

[Ryan]

Q You are joking me right? You didnt read my 3 post long response aswell?

[pindicator]

Serdoa, trying to understand why wolf-MJW wouldn't hold on to the item til the end. If he ever gets on the gallows he can just trigger it right before the end of the day, right? Uberfish, arent you supposed to be our item balance expert?)

My first reaction was what he did was pro-town because it seemed pretty clear Tasunke was getting lynched unless someone called Azza out as a liar. It seemed the same as giving us a second day.

What are your thoughts on zak-- independent of the MJW question.

[waterbat]

Its even more spread out now.

UnOfficial Lynch Vote Count

Selrahc - 3 - Merovech, Azza, MJW
zakalwe - 3 - pindicator, Lewwyn, uberfish
Azza - 2 - Mattimeo, waterbat
Merovech - 2 - novice, zakalwe
MJW - 2 - Serdoa, Ryan
Ryan - 1 - Qgqqqqq

Players not voting: Selrahc

3 hours to go.

[MJW (ya that one)]

:

You risked the vigi gun MJW.

No I did'nt. If tasunke really was the vig he would get lyched anyway. So we would not have the vig gun anyway. Why? Azza was far less scummy than tasunke. And its too tempting for the village to pass up a 50% (at least!) chance at a scum kill. I've never seen the village decline such odds.

[BRickAstley]

Items passed to a player that is killed that night will be lost/destroyed, but Snitches or the person holding the Hold-Out Pistol may not pass items to the target of their night kill.

After reviewing this rule, it appears to have been hasty and ill structured, considering that item passes happen after Kills, instead of before as I had originally planned. So after careful consideration, I am nullifying the previous rule and instating the following new rule.

From this point on, if an item is passed by any player to a person that has been killed that night, that item will be randomly distributed to another living player.

This rule will be added to the rules on the front page.

[MJW (ya that one)]

Items passed to a player that is killed that night will be lost/destroyed, but Snitches or the person holding the Hold-Out Pistol may not pass items to the target of their night kill.

After reviewing this rule, it appears to have been hasty and ill structured, considering that item passes happen after Kills, instead of before as I had originally planned. So after careful consideration, I am nullifying the previous rule and instating the following new rule.

From this point on, if an item is passed by any player to a person that has been killed that night, that item will be randomly distributed to another living player.

This rule will be added to the rules on the front page.

This means team village should try and remove uselss items from the game by passing them to confrimed villagers. This is because it is very likely that we will end up with more items than players sometime from now.

I'll just let my vote stay on Selrahc until he votes someone or the end.

[uberfish]

MJW: and what about your idea that Azza could actually have stolen Tasunke's item and been lying? You only brought that up AFTER your shot.

[Ryan]

Day 1, We all voted Tasunke to save Rowain. You do realize that I wrote that same reason with everyone else while you followed the Rowain wagon without providing any good reason besides what Novice and Uberfish said? It feels like you are describing your self more then my self im afraid. I already prooved to you that I dont restate points and I am sorry the fact that your are not catching up wont make me make me rewrite the three long posts I did responding to your earlier post.

"In this way he a) makes sure he's on a target at lynchtime. b) avoids any responsibility for the lynch. and c) is seen as explaining himself without entering the discussion.."

" he jumps onto the candidate. Read his reasoning - first he uses it as a chance to attack selrahc (already mentally rehearsing his I told you so speech) then he blatantly ignores the actual discussion around the topic (he was convinced by serdoa. yet never offers anything further to the discussion"

You forgot to mention I attacked both Selrhac and Waterbat during the night and day... Waterbat responded poorly and thats why I changed my vote to Waterbat. Waterbat claimed gas can AGAIN i was on of the first to change vote cause of that. Then I went back to the target i orignally attacked Selrhac. Serdoa caught MJW in a way that is extremely convincing. I said I will vote for MJW due to Serdoa's argument. Pindicator said why am i doing this? I explained why which is the context behind that post that you entirely ignored. And I even asked what you guys thought am I reading something wrong? ". I am not 100% surre pindicator if you have anything contradictory to what I am saying or If i am missing something speak now or be forever silent (tongue)".

You are trying to lynch me way to hard. First your saying I am not following the group and making a name for myself and THEN now you are accusing me of following people blindly? Are you even looking at what you are typing one after an other? and Why should I enter a discussion that I have nothing to provide to.

[Ryan]

Q you made two points contadictory against me. You voted me without even reading the response to the first claim you did versus me THEN you did a second claim completely different to the first one . You are trying to lynch me to hard and you know what heres my vote after those 2 claims you just made Qgqqqqq