WW 19 Game Thread - Mobster Mayhem - GAME OVER

[Ryan]

Ok I think we need to lynch some lurkers

Sareln

Why now?

because he's made zero posts the entire game?

Actually I dont like your reasoning at all and it just feels like you are trying to waste time. This is my vote untill I heard from the seer or vigilante. uberfish

[MJW (ya that one)]

Ok I think we need to lynch some lurkers

Sareln

No I think you are being incorrect. Firstly today is better since we will get intel on who was the first vigilantee and who was the first seer. Lynching lurkers? before we get this kind of information? Also, Werent you focusing on MJW the other day? You decided to switch and go for lurkers all of the sudden? You also didnt like Zak aswell and all I can see from you is ignoring the two targets you were aiming for to lynch lurkers? what gives? . I am not liking the way you did that random vote or lynch. It feels like a scum throwing his votes all around trying to please people and give them a town feel.

I think uberfish is just joking around until the night-vig and "seer" show up.

[uberfish]

That was a joke since I was voting a non-player, I just wanted to lighten things up a bit. so much for that :/

[MJW (ya that one)]

Ryan lastest post might be useful. But I cannot take this day seriously 'till Selrahc, the night-vig and seer show up.

[Ryan]

Selrahc show up? good night see you after next lynch.

[MJW (ya that one)]

Selrahc show up? good night see you after next lynch.

[/size]OJ SIMPSON DID EVERYTHING!!!!!!!!!111

...

[waterbat]

lol @ uber, ryan AND MJW

is OJ out of prison yet? if so,he really needs to get back on the job of finding the real killers

[uberfish]

Well I do realise my joke just ended up contributing to the useless spam, so apologies for that.

Anyway, I certainly don't think we should wait for the seer/vig. If the seer has an innocent result on someone he probably passed it to that player and therefore shouldn't claim. If he has a guilty there's information to be gained from seeing whom attacks or defends that player before he claims. Same with the day 1 vigilante who has a strong claim and doesn't need to use it yet unless he actually gets bandwagoned.

Regarding azza. I'll say that the pro-village argument I expected for stealing from Tasunke would have been "to see if he was lying" and he'd have gotten village points if he had said that. "I didn't trust Tasunke with the gun" is neutral - hell I probably wouldn't trust Tasunke with a gun either due to his chaotic style of play. What I don't like about azza is that he didn't do anything on day 2 after Tasunke got shot except to dump his vote on Selrahc for lurking. I take a pretty unfavourable view of lurkers who accuse other lurkers of lurking. Of course that's what merovech did too and he flipped town so But with azza we do have an example of his play in WW17 where he truthfully claimed roleseer when he was scum, and was subsequently overlooked for the rest of the game. So there are a few meta reasons to suspect azza

I do think whomever got the lockpick from Azza, if it has been passed on as he said he would, should claim it.

Regarding selrahc: Whoever is the new vigilante can shoot him if he doesn't post anything today

Regarding zakalwe: I felt pretty indecisive myself at the end of day 2 so I'm now less suspicious of him for the flipping.

Regarding pindicator: Seemed to be overreacting to serdoa putting him on his suspect list.

[zakalwe]

Started writing this a while ago, then got distracted and it turned into a crosspost with Uber.

Is it a given that the vig and seer want to claim? Maybe they didn't risk passing on their items and just kept them instead. I didn't want to start a discussion about it during the night, but I could see that as a possible course of action - at least for the vig. If so, it's kind of pointless to just sit around waiting for claims. I'm not too happy about "waiting for people to show up" votes either.

Anyway, I want Mattimeo to explain his play so far, if he is indeed the double voter. I also didn't like how Pindicator leveled a weak accusation against me tonight and then tried to back out of it with a laugh.

[waterbat]

vig and seer can't keep their items (well, assuming seer used his/her item night 1)