Q why are you agreeing with Zak all of the sudden?
WW22 - Diaries of the Madmen
|
+1
Jkaen, why did you assume you were roleblocked? After all, I'd already claimed a role which visits no one else.
Lynch
zakalwe (3) Jkaen Ryan uberfish Jkaen (2) zakalwe Qgqqqqq Mayor Ryan (3) uberfish Ryan Qgqqqqq zakalwe (1) zakalwe Jkaen (1) Jkaen (March 12th, 2024, 07:40)naufragar Wrote:"But naufragar, I want to be an emperor, not a product manager." Soon, my bloodthirsty friend, soon. (April 16th, 2013, 15:28)Qgqqqqq Wrote: I'm agreeing with what zak is saying, that jkaen's not saying what he did at night is a antitown move. Q, please read the thread properly, I did state it, it was uberfish. (April 16th, 2013, 17:40)uberfish Wrote: +1 Because scum wouldn't have known I was going to track you, hence I was going to be hugely shocked if was not roleblocked. The only other possible person to block would be ryan, and even if he was telling the truth, which I think was always in doubt, a second ability in addition to puppetmaster would have been a weak one that the scum would not have feared
Sorry I'd missed that. (I suspect its something to do with the forum move, as I missed a couple of posts on that page too).
I have no freaking clue at this point...
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
It is zak, don't let him sway you please, we need to take him down, and hope he is the roleblocker (which I suspect he is)
Once again, my point about Jkaen is that he acted as if his tracking target was irrelevant, and only provided it after I prodded him. He even tried to paint me as suspicious for asking about it.
It's pretty important to let us know that he was tracking Uberfish. Jkaen says he's convinced I'm scum. If so, there should be a decent (or at least non-zero) chance that Ryan attracted the role block after his overt threats against me. Therefore, this increases the probability that Uberfish is telling the truth. Even if it's just a weak corroboration of Uber's claim, it's not something you're likely to dismiss as irrelevant. So I don't think he received the tracking result and concluded that he had been blocked, and that the target was irrelevant. I think he decided that he's been blocked, and constructed the tracking result based on that. After a bad day one, his play has been extremely passive and low-profile. Both of his potential partners had an active hand in keeping him off the block on day 2, while he just hedged and voted defensively. On day 3, he was saved by the Gazglum landslide and could once again just lay low. I really think he's our safest bet. The only realistic alternative from my point of view is Uber+Q. That's possible, but I don't think the pieces fit quite so well in that scenario.
If you know what I mean.
Zak this is rubbish. I am a good enough player that if I was making this up I would be discussing in the scum thread well before hand who to claim I tracked.
(April 17th, 2013, 01:55)Qgqqqqq Wrote: Sorry I'd missed that. (I suspect its something to do with the forum move, as I missed a couple of posts on that page too). Q, try looking at it this way: If you are innocent then you know this obviously, and you can be 99% sure that Ryan is to. The chances of me and zak being scum partners has got to be fairly low, hence you must believe there is a very good chance that uber is scum. Given the above right now you are giving uber the chance to either stay on zak if I am scum, or flip to me at the last minute if zak is scum, hence winning the game. Therefore you have to act in a voting block with Ryan, otherwise scum walk this game. So unless you can convince Ryan zak is innocent you need to vote for him. The other option of course is you are scum, in which case as long as uber stays in a voting block with Ryan we have won If Ryan is scum I think we will lose |