Posts: 3,140
Threads: 26
Joined: Feb 2009
Hmm. Okay. Jowy, are you going to get a list together for Bigger of the full "Action List" of the day? I'm just going off memory here.
Pindicator may be foolish then. Or alternatively, Ichabod was just pulling some misdirection.
Posts: 3,140
Threads: 26
Joined: Feb 2009
And actually, can someone from R1Barracks get an action list for their room?
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
(May 8th, 2013, 15:02)Selrahc Wrote: (May 8th, 2013, 14:46)Bigger Wrote: well then ichabod can't be the dealer, otherwise uber and Q would have had to accept my offer.
ill have to re-read when I get off work, I must have misunderstood you.
At no point did anybody "[bolded]Full reveal with Ichabod[/bolded]", which is the only thing that triggers the dealer effect.
Both of them offered him a full reveal, he turned them down, and he then sent a private reveal to them and they reciprocated. They shared roles but without the downside of getting hit by the dealer ability.
Really, there isn't a lot of point to full revealing if you have any trust with the person you're doing it with at all. A private reveal gives the same info, in a verified format, while also not revealing to the thread whether you sent a full reveal or a color reveal. And it avoids the dealer penalty.
wtf. what is the point of having "reveal with" if you can just bypass it by sending info? we would be in a lot better shape if me and cyneheard were aware of this. Isn't this cheating?
Brick, can you confirm?
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
Posts: 5,641
Threads: 30
Joined: Apr 2009
I'll put the action list together this evening - I have a spreadsheet, and it's not at work.
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
From rules post:
Quote:Players are also allowed to simply show another player their color or role if they'd like. To do this, a player would publicly state in bold in his room's thread, "Private reveal [color/role] to [player]"
Only downside is that the one you are revealing with isn't forced to reveal back.
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
Also:
Quote:Players may not directly quote posts from previous rounds, paraphrasing is okay but not quoting.
Which is why I'm reluctant to make an "action list".
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
well thats retarded, but clever of ichabod.
what I get for not studying the rules, I guess.
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
(May 8th, 2013, 15:33)Bigger Wrote: well thats retarded, but clever of ichabod.
what I get for not studying the rules, I guess.
Quiet, spy!
Posts: 3,140
Threads: 26
Joined: Feb 2009
(May 8th, 2013, 15:20)Jowy Wrote: Also:
Quote:Players may not directly quote posts from previous rounds, paraphrasing is okay but not quoting.
Which is why I'm reluctant to make an "action list".
An action list is paraphrasing though...
1. Snarflorg private revealed to Wiggles
2. Wiggles public colour revealed as rainbow
3. Snarflorg private revealed to Glumph
4. Snarflorg public colour revealed as radiation
5. Glumph offers full reveal to Wiggles
6. Wiggles refuses.
That would all be paraphrasing a much longer conversation, without using any direct quotes. Perfectly fine.
Posts: 5,641
Threads: 30
Joined: Apr 2009
On second thought: Bigger, Lewwyn: An action list will reveal something that we've intentionally avoided revealing. Do we want to share the action list with everyone?
Within this room:
Mattimeo color-revealed with all three of us
I full-revealed with Bigger and Lewwyn
|
