Posts: 2,313
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2010
(May 14th, 2013, 13:21)scooter Wrote: They rarely reply quicker than that honestly. It's not something that really needs a response from them either right? What would you even say if you're them?
They teched Machinery. If I am them, and I saw our power graph, I might seriously consider Nationhood revolt too.
Completed: SG2-Wonders or Else!; SG3-Monarch Can't Hold Me; WW3-Surviving Wolf; PBEM3-Replacement for Timmy of Khmer; PBEM11-Screwed Up Huayna Capac of Zulu; PBEM19-GES, Roland & Friends (Mansa of Egypt); SG4-Immortality Scares Me
Posts: 15,301
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
I'm not sure what either of you are thinking we'd say in a hypothetical follow-up? We've still got over 30 turns of NAP remaining with them.
Posts: 2,313
Threads: 16
Joined: May 2010
(May 14th, 2013, 13:55)scooter Wrote: I'm not sure what either of you are thinking we'd say in a hypothetical follow-up? We've still got over 30 turns of NAP remaining with them.
I don't think we should say anything. I am saying what I think their response should be. Would you really trust an NAP if you saw that power graph?
Completed: SG2-Wonders or Else!; SG3-Monarch Can't Hold Me; WW3-Surviving Wolf; PBEM3-Replacement for Timmy of Khmer; PBEM11-Screwed Up Huayna Capac of Zulu; PBEM19-GES, Roland & Friends (Mansa of Egypt); SG4-Immortality Scares Me
Posts: 3,916
Threads: 14
Joined: Feb 2011
Because you have no choice: absolutely. It's a signal the asker wants to hit someone else.
Posts: 15,301
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
(May 14th, 2013, 14:24)Gold Ergo Sum Wrote: (May 14th, 2013, 13:55)scooter Wrote: I'm not sure what either of you are thinking we'd say in a hypothetical follow-up? We've still got over 30 turns of NAP remaining with them.
I don't think we should say anything. I am saying what I think their response should be. Would you really trust an NAP if you saw that power graph?
Ah yeah makes sense. Yeah I'd be inquiring about our power spike if I was them for sure.
Posts: 4,443
Threads: 45
Joined: Nov 2009
I'd like to think we've been d r a f t i n g a proposal since we revolted to Nationalism.
In Soviet Russia, Civilization Micros You!
"Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must."
“I have never understood why it is "greed" to want to keep the money you have earned but not greed to want to take somebody else's money.”
Posts: 2,852
Threads: 20
Joined: Feb 2011
(May 14th, 2013, 14:24)Gold Ergo Sum Wrote: (May 14th, 2013, 13:55)scooter Wrote: I'm not sure what either of you are thinking we'd say in a hypothetical follow-up? We've still got over 30 turns of NAP remaining with them.
I don't think we should say anything. I am saying what I think their response should be. Would you really trust an NAP if you saw that power graph?
+1
Active in:
FFH-20: Jonas Endain of the Clan of Embers
EITB Pitboss 1: Clan/Elohim/Calabim with Mardoc and Thoth
Posts: 4,416
Threads: 34
Joined: Dec 2010
From CFC:
Quote:Greetings RB Friends,
We needed our marble until very recently, and we will need our marble for our own plans again in about 15 turns, so we must insist you make a choice: Either you take the marble within the next 5 turns (t140-145), or we will have to waive our original agreed deadline and re-arrange our deal as we will then be outside of the turn 150 window.
We can't delay another ten turns because that is when we will be needing it back. We are prepared to offer it in-game now. If you do not accept it within the timeframe that we had agreed to, then we will have to try to come to a new one. I'm sure you understand as we both agreed that the gift could be arranged around both our teams needs for marble.
Thanks,
Caledorn, Foreign Minister of Team CFC
Posts: 2,534
Threads: 22
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,658
Threads: 31
Joined: Jun 2011
So they're trying to frame it as we agreed to accept and end our use of the marble by T150 now? And they have the balls to issue an ultimatum over it, threatening to waive what exactly? The resource deal where they have already got what they wanted out of it?
If they try to dick us around how about we do it back. Cut one of the happy resources. We don't need their marble. Maybe they don't need the happiness. I hope it sets their cities to riot.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, secure back line when at war. But they don't know where our stack is going. Let's see if they're hasty to say we violated the NAP deal by cutting the happy supply. It's no worse than what they've done by not supplying the resource they owe us in a fair way. And if they do say the deal is done, well we have a big stack and they don't. After they have a few cities burned they may reconsider. (How close is the mids city to our borders anyway?  Burn!)
One other question. Our NAP is to 175 so we can't fight or actively support someone else fighting the until then, and they can't do the same to us I suppose. But they're surely building a coalition to dogpile us ASAP after T175. Does anyone think it would be a good idea to sign a MPP with the Spanish covering ONLY invasion from CFC? I'm not sure who else we can enlist on our side in a future dogpile, maybe WPC but they'll probably be as useless as the Spanish. Nevermind, a MPP is probably a terrible idea. But maybe someone else can think of a way to build an alliance for us for when the dogpile comes. Anything to soften the attack or distract/divert our attackers would be helpful.
|
