WW24: The Ashes of Brigdarrow: VILLAGE WINS

[Azza]

Also, sticking with Tasunke. Shows up, does nothing, disappears again.

[Rowain]

Neither BRick nor Tasunke do inspire trust. In fact I'm not sure who is more scummish for his silence.
But to make the 2 equal (and perhaps get a reaction one way or the other)

Tasunke

[zakalwe]

You think Tasunke is scummy, Rowain? I don't see why anyone would have more than a null read on him.

If you want to do a policy lynch, be honest about it.

[Rowain]

You think Tasunke is scummy, Rowain? I don't see why anyone would have more than a null read on him.

If you want to do a policy lynch, be honest about it.

He turned up when several people had 2 votes (including him) then turned around and did a "I'm not here"-move again. But in all honesty I don't see BRick as that much more scummy in fact I can feel with him getting annoyed and therefor punishing the town with silence.
So far I really don't care who of those 2 get lynched as both have done little to nothing pro-village and I'm more interested in reaction to the current tally.

[Gazglum]

I would prefer subbing or modkilling Tasunke, or failing that have a vigilante take him out. I'm worried that lynching him gives us no real info to go on, compared to an alternative (at this point, clearly Brick).

[BRickAstley]

I've been out longer then I meant to, and don't have the energy to look through and make any sort of post of value. I'm sorry for my outburst, and I can't blame people for lynching me, all I can say is if you let me live I'll do my best in the next day to make up for it.

[Rowain]

I would prefer subbing or modkilling Tasunke, or failing that have a vigilante take him out. I'm worried that lynching him gives us no real info to go on, compared to an alternative (at this point, clearly Brick).

Tell me what info do we get if we lynch BRick? I don't see that much usefull info gained either.

About Tasunke:

... Tasunke who may not even know the game is up

I'm rather sure he knows it is up because of this post in the pre-game thread (some hours before it really started but also some hours after the intro-posts in this threads)
Therefor I would be fine with replacing him if he doesn't show up till DL or has not yet told the GM that he is deliberately not posting. In the meantime I hope it is nothing serious that stops him from playing .

that was only a few HOURS before the game started? ... >_<
damnit xD

This shows he has read the thread already and choses to answer me here - 6(!) minutes after he officially returned. And from all the posts he choses this one to answer but nothing else ? Not to mention that I do not buy his surprise. There was already a Lurkerthread and there was already the Introduction posted - what did he believe when the game starts?

[zakalwe]

I've been out longer then I meant to, and don't have the energy to look through and make any sort of post of value. I'm sorry for my outburst, and I can't blame people for lynching me, all I can say is if you let me live I'll do my best in the next day to make up for it.

You can vote Tasunke to save yourself, you know.

[Serdoa]

Should be 4:4 now between BRick and Tasunke. I'm torn because I don't really see the case for BRick, but there certainly are more interactions to look at after the lynch. Though those are only so helpful if he is village. Tasunke on the other hand will not yield any information but I also don't expect him to add anything meaningful down the road.

Tasunke

I don't like lurkers and I rather have BRick around and maybe get a better read on D2 than having Tasunke around and no clue at all.

[novice]

I would prefer subbing or modkilling Tasunke, or failing that have a vigilante take him out. I'm worried that lynching him gives us no real info to go on, compared to an alternative (at this point, clearly Brick).

We might not have a vig, and he won't be replaced or modkilled without going completely awol.

Plus it's annoying how players keeps signing up for things they don't have time for, even keeping others from playing.