Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
(May 29th, 2013, 01:20)Jkaen Wrote: I also think it was way too big of a gamble for the two of you to take with no real evidence, hence very tempted to vote there tomorrow
It's not such a big gamble if you already feel like you're headed for a mislynch.
No, I won't be sharing any results today, Gazglum. Care to explain why you're asking me that?
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
What's the connection between those two quotes, Lewwyn?
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 12,335
Threads: 46
Joined: Jan 2011
(May 29th, 2013, 02:28)zakalwe Wrote: What's the connection between those two quotes, Lewwyn?
(May 28th, 2013, 07:41)Ichabod Wrote: Either way, voting Zak tomorrow.
(May 28th, 2013, 10:38)Lewwyn Wrote: If you are wondering whether I'm only going to vote for you tomrrow, I haven't decided.
Of the two of us, Ichabod was the one who stated he would vote for you no matter what, while I was still on the fence and still thinking about who I would vote for. Oddly enough Ichabod is the one who was killed! Your statement that you could just kill me instead of dealing with my pesky retorts is actually the opposite of what you feel. Ichabod was voting no matter what. Retorts means you have the chance to move me off my stance. So Kill Ichabod and keep arguing with me all day, which also gives you something to do and gives you the opportunity to played the persecuted "and have your reads suffer" as a result is exactly what you would do as scum.
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
I'm not the one with bad reads here.
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 2,423
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2012
(May 29th, 2013, 02:27)zakalwe Wrote: No, I won't be sharing any results today, Gazglum. Care to explain why you're asking me that?
I think your play over the last 24 hours has been not exactly scummy per se, but weird.
Flipping your vote to lynch Serdoa - that was a bit weird. I understand your reasoning, but it sure came out of left field.
This post:
(May 28th, 2013, 16:35)zakalwe Wrote: Ichabod, what is bad about my explanation for voting Serdoa?
For the greater good, you really shouldn't waste your time on me tomorrow. And yeah, I'll probably still be here. I bet the scum will be so annoyed by my arrogance that they'll keep me around.
That was really weird. Way too scummy, from you, to actually be scummy?
Saying that Scum Zak couldn't know there was a SK anyway, when Mattimeo had already explained that scum could know about SK (post 361), and a moment's reflection would tell you the same. That's not the kind of mistake I expect you to make. That was weird.
End of Day 2 you were on nobody's kill list but Ichabods. Now you're a frontrunner. Why would scum Zak have played things in such a way to paint such a big target on his chest? To potentially (but not certainly) lynch a probable-village Serdoa over another probable-villager?
What I saw last night, or what I thought I saw, was a Power Role townie who was in danger of being nightkilled making his best attempt to scum himself up enough to deflect the kill. That's the only real way your posts make sense to me.
Anyway, since I don't really buy that Serdoa wouldn't kill anybody night one, I think we have a doctor, so it seems like it might be safe to claim something if you're a blocker or a cop. If YOU actually are the doctor...maybe keep quiet. If you're a mason, I Hope it will help you narrow down the scum today.
If you have no power-role, then I think your play makes less sense.
But I can see that holding off on any claims till late in the day makes sense anyway, so I'm happy to leave it for now.
Posts: 5,157
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
I wasn't trying to scum it up, Gazglum. That's not my style as a villager. Though I certainly wouldn't try to scum it up as scum, either.
(May 28th, 2013, 16:35)zakalwe Wrote: Ichabod, what is bad about my explanation for voting Serdoa?
For the greater good, you really shouldn't waste your time on me tomorrow. And yeah, I'll probably still be here. I bet the scum will be so annoyed by my arrogance that they'll keep me around.
This second paragraph of that post was a joke / friendly jab to Ichabod, referencing both his defense against me on day 1, and his accusation against me on day 2. I'll dig up the original posts that it's referencing if you didn't actually get it.
Yeah, I missed Mattimeo's point that the scum might know there was a SK. I was thinking in the context of "since the start of the game" when I wrote that. The existence of a SK was being touted as something that changed everything and suddenly crystallized my play as scum, which I felt was a bad premise since I couldn't have known there was a SK. But yeah, I could have known from the start of day 2. Sorry for missing that angle, though I don't really get why it should be considered a scummy oversight. Anyway, I guess I'll ask my attackers to show me where I suddenly switched gears and started hunting for the SK at the start of day 2, then.
And once again, let me emphasize that the most important reason for why the SK's existence is unimportant is that I could be town hunting for scum. It's only relevant in that we know Serdoa was giving off genuine scum vibes, which indicates that my scumhunting in genuine. And it's only through supervillain logic contortions that you can portray genuine scumhunting as a scum tell.
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
Why are you voting for me, Jkaen?
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
(May 23rd, 2013, 14:17)Ichabod Wrote: For the greater good, yes. Zakalwe shouldn't waste time with me.
(May 27th, 2013, 18:07)Ichabod Wrote: His comment about "arrogance for not being night killed" seem to me like a way to defend himself against doubts when he is not night killed on night 2 and the following ones (due to being a wolfman). The wolves were annoyed by his arrogance and decided not to kill him, he's going to claim that.
Here are those posts that I was referencing, Gazglum.
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 2,534
Threads: 22
Joined: Jan 2012
I'm not feeling a Zak case.
I do have a question for Rowain though.
Post 281;
(May 27th, 2013, 05:39)Rowain Wrote: Further down the list:
Azza Serdoa Lewwyn look rather townish to me.
Mattimeo too (although hard to read ).
Jkaens attack (vs me) is fitting for his village-self and zak so far has not given off too many wolf-vibes so I see no reason to lynch him today
What changed from this point for you to suspect Serdoa?
|
