Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
Congrats village.
I don't think the setup is anti-scum - in my opinion anyway, the general quality of scum play here has caught up with village play, so village does need its PRs to have a fair shot at winning.
Posts: 7,916
Threads: 158
Joined: Jan 2012
Well, we could develop our own version of that setup that would be considered "more fair", it shouldn't be too hard to have a few people try and balance one out.
Uberfish, are you up for hosting this next one or do we need to find someone else?
Posts: 2,534
Threads: 22
Joined: Jan 2012
Didn't seem unfair to me.
Posts: 6,141
Threads: 10
Joined: Mar 2012
I think the setups fine the way it is. we don't always have to reinvent the wheel here.
Please don't go. The drones need you. They look up to you.
Posts: 6,630
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2010
I think the point is that scum doesn't seem to get adjusted depending on the number of village PRs. That's not about fairness, that's about it being "illogical" that for example 7T is faced with no village PRs while 5T is faced with 2 village PRs. But both have a Goon + Godfather + SK setup on the scum-side. So "obviously" 5T is harder for scum than 7T. One could of course argue that the Godfather is in a 7T setup just a standard mafia-guy as there is no one to scan him, but that could be true in the 5T setup as well.
Anyhow, I think the game ended not for setup imbalances the way it did but simply for village getting really, really lucky (and seriously scum not playing it all that great, I mean seriously, you try to kill Rowain N1? And when you fail you try it again N3 - after the SK has been revealed and it is obvious that it can't have been his possible 1-shot NK-immunity?)
As for a new game: I am considering hosting one, but I am thinking about the setup currently and aren't sure if I can make what I want.
Posts: 1,487
Threads: 14
Joined: Dec 2011
(June 3rd, 2013, 12:59)Serdoa Wrote: Anyhow, I think the game ended not for setup imbalances the way it did but simply for village getting really, really lucky (and seriously scum not playing it all that great, I mean seriously, you try to kill Rowain N1? And when you fail you try it again N3 - after the SK has been revealed and it is obvious that it can't have been his possible 1-shot NK-immunity?)
We went after Lewwyn, and I'm not denying we played badly but I don't think the nightkill on Lewwyn was an awful mistake. To my mind there was Lewwyn, Zakalwe, Novice and yourself, all who would've made good candidates for doctoring night 1. Zakalwe arguably looked the most innocent and you yourself went after Novice.
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
(June 3rd, 2013, 12:59)Serdoa Wrote: I think the point is that scum doesn't seem to get adjusted depending on the number of village PRs. That's not about fairness, that's about it being "illogical" that for example 7T is faced with no village PRs while 5T is faced with 2 village PRs.
Correct. The illogical aspect is what makes me wonder.
(June 3rd, 2013, 12:59)Serdoa Wrote: Anyhow, I think the game ended not for setup imbalances the way it did but simply for village getting really, really lucky
Brilliant guesswork and 'great Minds think alike' you mean data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cea03/cea03f7367eff1fa2741fc17bef993240ab59276" alt="wink wink" .
lucky pfff no respect the youngsters have
June 6th, 2013, 02:36
(This post was last modified: June 6th, 2013, 02:37 by uberfish.)
Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
I'm still too busy to GM for a couple of weeks. I could play a seat of my pants game and possibly get policy lynched
Posts: 10,104
Threads: 82
Joined: May 2012
I can host the same thing again - this time with less effort - if wanted.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
(June 6th, 2013, 05:02)Qgqqqqq Wrote: I can host the same thing again - this time with less effort - if wanted.
I'd play.
I have to run.
|