Posts: 1,650
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2011
(June 21st, 2013, 03:54)MJW (ya that one) Wrote: 1. Serdoa says he is bad at English because he is not a native speaker. I am aware of this. He's still better at it than most people I observe on facebook regularly.
(June 21st, 2013, 03:35)Rowain Wrote: (June 21st, 2013, 03:15)Mattimeo Wrote: I follow MJW's reasoning as to why 40 could be a max, but don't necessarily agree that such a limit would be enforced by possibly game actions. If so, we're exceedingly unlikely to ever reach either extreme. Could you explain what you mean with that? Somehow I fail to grasp why we are unlikely to reach the extremes etc ? If there's a 'natural' cap of 40 / 0, that is, those are the limits of what we could possibly reach, then we're not likely to reach either - any movement in the opposite direction decreases the possible range.
If, on the other hand, those are arbitrary limits (or there are no enforced limits, which I would deem more likely), we're not unlikely to reach extremes.
Quote:BTW Matt is it true that you have something going on with novice's wife? I have heard she is it quite happy lately despite the fact that novice spends more time with zak then with her 
What? Nah, this game I decided to switch back to the other mason partner, so it's just me and Azza*.
*I am not actually a mason or a neighbour, and I have no knowledge about Azza's role.
-- Don’t forget.
Always, somewhere,
someone is fighting for you.
-- As long as you remember her,
you are not alone.
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
(June 21st, 2013, 03:35)Rowain Wrote: And I only hinted that MJW could be either an asset or an liability so what?
To paraphrase, you said "I wonder if he'll be an asset or a liability?" which tends to imply that you think the two scenarios are about equally likely. So it's not a neutral statement, in my opinion.
Anyway...
Slowcheetah
And yeah, now I'm voting with Q, despite saying he was slightly scummy.
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 10,102
Threads: 82
Joined: May 2012
Why am I scummy zak?
And what is wrong with voting alongside people you find scummy?
MJW is generally a distracting influence, but I don't think that warrants a lynch.
Brick could you clarify whether you can quote whole (1 brick) or part (many bricks) of posts? (I think only whole is stupid, as it encourages spam).
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
(June 21st, 2013, 04:53)Qgqqqqq Wrote: MJW is generally a distracting influence, but I don't think that warrants a lynch.
You're slightly scummy because you've made several comments like the above, which look more geared towards collecting credibility as a voice of reason than actually hunting for scum.
I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with voting alongside scummy people. Rowain was holding that against me earlier, though, so I just preempted his complaint.
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 10,102
Threads: 82
Joined: May 2012
Ok. I'm not seeing any tells, and offering my opinions.
I do get what you mean though.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
Posts: 8,244
Threads: 30
Joined: Jun 2004
(June 21st, 2013, 04:38)zakalwe Wrote: To paraphrase, you said "I wonder if he'll be an asset or a liability?" which tends to imply that you think the two scenarios are about equally likely.
Correct
(June 21st, 2013, 04:38)zakalwe Wrote: So it's not a neutral statement, in my opinion.
How about honest opinion?
And I do thing that 50:50 is pretty neutral
With MJW and slowcheetah currently in front with 3 votes each I think I'll switch to Qgqqqq right now.
Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
Anyone else having trouble with the forum lagging?
Anyway, MJW because I find his reason for voting Brick very contrived. Makes it feel that either he's trying too hard to have a justification for the vote, or he has inside info on the sanity mechanics which is more likely to come from a wolf as they have multiple team members sharing info.
Zak, to clarify, are you voting for SC because you agree with Q?
Posts: 5,157
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2011
Just to clarify here, are people voting MJW because they honestly think he is scum, or because they dont agree with what he is saying, i feel some votes here may be the latter
Posts: 12,335
Threads: 46
Joined: Jan 2011
(June 21st, 2013, 06:30)Jkaen Wrote: Just to clarify here, are people voting MJW because they honestly think he is scum, or because they dont agree with what he is saying, i feel some votes here may be the latter
I don't agree with everything he's saying, but Only one post has made me suspicious of him hence I'm not voting for him.
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
Uberfish - I also had some lag issues earlier.
(June 20th, 2013, 17:59)Qgqqqqq Wrote: Slowcheetah for relying on history/bandwagoning.
I agree with Q and Novice about the "relying on history" part, in that it's a lame reason for a vote. I'm not sure Slowcheetah can be accused of bandwagoning, though, as he was probably cross-posting with me when he voted for Rowain. On the other hand, he did leave his vote on Rowain without commenting further.
Not that there's necessarily anything wrong with bandwagoning. That's essentially what I'm doing at the moment.
I think MJW's reasoning about the sanity mechanics was pretty self-contained, so I don't really see where any inside information would be leaking in.
If you know what I mean.
|
