WW25 - Game Thread

[pindicator]

Zak, i already posted my reason. It's more of a feel off his posts, and how it reminds me of a prior wolf game of his.

Question back at ya: after your back and forth with Brick, what's your thoughts on him and his accusation on you?

[Qgqqqqq]

I find Bricks posts funny, though I struggle working them out. Jowy seems to be screaming wolf atm, but I get the feeling a wolf would've noticed everyone's reactions to his posts and changed, like BRick tried last game.
I don't have any real lean on MJW, except that I'm not noticing anything particularly bad and would rather not make day 1 focused around him.
I'm not noticing anything particularly outside that, though novice is quite quiet.

[BRickAstley]

Zak, i already posted my reason. It's more of a feel off his posts, and how it reminds me of a prior wolf game of his.

Question back at ya: after your back and forth with Brick, what's your thoughts on him and his accusation on you?

[zakalwe]

Question back at ya: after your back and forth with Brick, what's your thoughts on him and his accusation on you?

Maybe you mean Rowain? I'll keep him in mind, but he's off the hook for now.

[zakalwe]

Which wolf game is it that MJW reminds you of?

[Ichabod]

Zak, i already posted my reason. It's more of a feel off his posts, and how it reminds me of a prior wolf game of his.

Question back at ya: after your back and forth with Brick, what's your thoughts on him and his accusation on you?

Pindicator.

[pindicator]

Which wolf game is it that MJW reminds you of?

My first one, where he was lynched as a wolf on day 1.

Brick, i think you misunderstand the meaning behind my question to zak. Or maybe i misunderstood your pictures ... One sec (phone is crappy for quoting )

[pindicator]

It just dawned on me... Post #39 is just Brick telling us to use yes/no questions. It has nothing to do with sanity.

I took this as meaning "You're not listening to me. You're not hunting wolves, Zak."

Was i wrong?

[Qgqqqqq]

Lynch tells, nothing strikes me as obvious. Q feels curt and I'm a relatively easy mislynch, so good to go after. On the otherhand my first post was apparently pretty baity based on the reactions of most.

I know its a instant reaction to go after someone you feel attacking you, but I don't like this post. Firstly, I'm not really going after you as you claim, a simple post saying a reason I found you suspicious is nothing more then half the players have at this point. Therefore it seems to me that you're simply attacking people voting you at this point, which is an easy move to get away with because you can claim emotional reaction. In the process you are dismissing the vote by saying that you're easy to go after, while simultaneously excusing your suspicion against me by saying that it was a bait worthy post.
I'm not sure I've explained myself properly, but the summary is an attack without attacking, avoiding a confrontation while smearing my vote on you.

I don't want to kill Brick entirely because I'm enjoying his posts. Zak and you are sparring, leaves me fairly convinced that my vote for you has less of a point than it did in the first place.

Fluff, dismissing his earlier vote (though I still find the timing suspect). Is he saying he has town read on zak/Rowain? I can't tell.

Azza hasn't really said much.

A very easy on azza, no real explanation and maintaining that there's no suspicion (so he has no responsibility). Azza never says much, but you really do seem to be trying to fly under the radar.

Wel if nobody is really ringing, surely the best option is ringing up one of the guys with low post counts. It's not like we are particularly late in day one yet.

Why is the best option to dump a vote on someone who isn't going to post because of it (azza)? And someone who isn't going to be lynched today, who you have no suspicions on?

Slow doesn't say much in his other posts. Suffice to say, I think he's trying desperately to lurk and avoid confrontation.
slowcheetah

[BRickAstley]

It just dawned on me... Post #39 is just Brick telling us to use yes/no questions. It has nothing to do with sanity.

I took this as meaning "You're not listening to me. You're not hunting wolves, Zak."

Was i wrong?

It just dawned on me... Post #39 is just Brick telling us to use yes/no questions. It has nothing to do with sanity.