Posts: 12,335
Threads: 46
Joined: Jan 2011
(June 27th, 2013, 04:12)zakalwe Wrote: But in any case, even if it's quite likely that he's innocent, we should still lynch him.
ORLY？
“The wind went mute and the trees in the forest stood still. It was time for the last tale.”
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
(June 27th, 2013, 04:26)Jkaen Wrote: I think it needs to be enacted every now and then, but as default button no.
Always as with everything its a grey scale. For example I could see a case when I claimed I had no power role when I was infact the seer. I would assume that you wouldnt apply lynch all liars at that point.
Well obviously, I wouldn't lynch you if I knew you were innocent and lying. But if I only know that you're lying, and don't know if you're innocent, then it might come into play.
Of course it's a grey scale, but I don't think you can argue that Brick had a good reason for lying in this instance. So if his lie here doesn't qualify for a policy lynch, I have to wonder what would.
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 7,902
Threads: 13
Joined: Aug 2006
(June 27th, 2013, 04:38)Lewwyn Wrote: ORLY？
YARLY. Deal with it.
If you know what I mean.
Posts: 1,650
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2011
(June 27th, 2013, 03:13)Lewwyn Wrote: Azza did die, but that was because he was a ghoul. If he were human something else would have happened. Can we assume the same goes for your target last night?
(June 27th, 2013, 04:24)Gazglum Wrote: I still don't like Uber too much, and I still think that one of the MJW voters is scum. That list is narrowing now. I might re-read Mattimeo tonight. What? I wasn't on MJW when he got lynched...
Jkaen's put some effort in, time to lynch all liars. BRickAstley
-- Don’t forget.
Always, somewhere,
someone is fighting for you.
-- As long as you remember her,
you are not alone.
Posts: 5,157
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2011
Please dont go down this route, lynch all liars is a lazy vote as when (and if) he turns up village everybody can just say 'not my fault' and have no guilty concience
Its not like he was 'caught' in the lie. If he wanted to he could easily have claimed today that since insanisty has dropped he can post freely now
This group falls into meta voting far too often (ie the double voter, despite not knowing who it is must be scum). This is why the scum keep kicking our ass more often now then they used to.
Please can we look big picture here and vote for people we think may actually be werewolves
Posts: 5,157
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts 301 - 340
(June 22nd, 2013, 12:53)Rowain Wrote: Tally
pindicator (4) - slowcheetah, Azza, Jowy, uberfish
Jowy (4) - Jkaen, Gazglum, Mattimeo, BRickAstley
uberfish (4) - novice, pindicator, zakalwe, Rowain,
slowcheetah (2) - Qgqqqqq, Lewwyn
Mattimeo (1) - MJW
MJW ( 1 ) - Ichabod,
(June 22nd, 2013, 13:00)Serdoa Wrote: --------------------------------------- Deadline --------------------------------
Official End-Tally for Day 1
MJW (6) - Ichabod, Rowain, zakalwe, uberfish, pindicator, BRickAstley
Jowy (3) - Jkaen, Gazglum, Mattimeo
uberfish (3) - novice, Jowy, +1
slowcheetah (2.1) - Qgqqqqq, Lewwyn
pindicator (2) - slowcheetah, Azza
Mattimeo (1) - MJW
Ok this swing was just crazy, and seemed to have little reason behind it, we had:
Rowain(vil) uberfish - MJW(vil)
zak uberfish - MJW (vil)
uberfish pind - MJW (vil)
pind uberfish - MJW (vil)
brick jowy - MJW (vil)
So Rowain late swinging, and zak folowing him based on last game I can see
uberfish i dont understand why he wasnt on Jowy, and why he didnt switch to Jowy, this looks odd
Pind returned to a previous target he thought was not an option, and brick had already stated MJW as his prefered lynch (i think)
Does make uberfish look the most suspicious here
Posts: 4,471
Threads: 65
Joined: Feb 2006
To everyone asserting that there must be a scum in the group of MJW voters at the end of day 1, do you actually have any basis for this beyond "it's a group of 6 people so I can't believe there isn't a scum in it?"
Posts: 2,423
Threads: 4
Joined: Apr 2012
(June 27th, 2013, 06:41)uberfish Wrote: To everyone asserting that there must be a scum in the group of MJW voters at the end of day 1, do you actually have any basis for this beyond "it's a group of 6 people so I can't believe there isn't a scum in it?"
It's not a random group of six people though (and even if it was, there would probably be a scum in it). You and Pindi had been deemed scummy enough to be in the running for hte lynch. PLus, there was herd behaviour at the deadline, and I think wolves want to go with the flow to avoid standing out, which in this case meant voting MJW.
@ Matt, I know you weren't on at deadline, I was thinking about the vote you placed on him earlier. As I've said, I thought MJW was good place for a wolf to idle in neutral for a while considering their options.
Posts: 5,157
Threads: 37
Joined: Jan 2011
Exactly if it was a group of votes that gathered naturally over time I wouldnt be suspicious. A big last minute rush like that with no reasoning however is different.
Posts: 8,293
Threads: 83
Joined: Oct 2009
if villager die next, sanity 10 or under. wolf-brick would reveal then, not now.
that said, villager-brick distract village too much. but i make same mistake, so im biased to believe he has good intention.
btw azza was enemy, not neutral or our side. look at sanity numbers.
villager:
qqqq
jowy
brick
uberfish
pindicator
lewwyn
wolf:
zakalwe
gazglum
novice
not sure:
jkaen (dont like his arguments, but i think clueless villager atm.)
mattimeo
pretty much same reasons as last day. everything so far seem to add up to my last assessment. i will vote one of the wolf.
big change is lewwyn to villager. I buy his ability theory. and i think he kill azza, who was enemy.
|
