(July 25th, 2013, 14:25)Ubercannon Wrote: Weird . I was also using that. Was using the spreadsheet tab though, not the macro code since I can't get the macros to run.
The spreadsheet tab is incomplete and does not work correctly. The only valid values off my calculator come with the macros enabled.
(July 25th, 2013, 14:25)Ubercannon Wrote: Weird . I was also using that. Was using the spreadsheet tab though, not the macro code since I can't get the macros to run.
The spreadsheet tab is incomplete and does not work correctly. The only valid values off my calculator come with the macros enabled.
Thanks sareln. I don't suppose you could make a version that works in open office or the free version of excel?
(July 25th, 2013, 17:30)pindicator Wrote: Is that chart right? C1 knights shouldn't do better than c1 muskets- should they?
Why not? Knights have a higher base strength. I imagine that would make a greater impact once the rifle has been max-collateraled, despite the rifle's 25% bonus against mounted. Seems counterintuitive but it could check out. I don't have a way to doublecheck at the moment though.
This raises the question: do we want pinch muskets from HF? We only have time for 2 knights/muskets before T170.
Zargon, or someone else, can you also do those for unpromoted maces? If we get a large stack of rifles I imagine that we'd slam some cats into it, then go with units still at losing odds. At that point I think we could use maces.
(July 25th, 2013, 18:52)kalin Wrote: Zargon, or someone else, can you also do those for unpromoted maces? If we get a large stack of rifles I imagine that we'd slam some cats into it, then go with units still at losing odds. At that point I think we could use maces.
Maceman vs. 70HP rifleman: 37.74% chance of winning.