Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
(August 15th, 2013, 01:32)ironstar Wrote: I would say that aiding a third party in aggression violates the spirit of a non aggression pact.
I'm pretty sure CFC's face violates the spirit of the earth, but that's never stopped them. 
Posts: 17,462
Threads: 78
Joined: Nov 2005
If we're sure that they are sending intel to our enemies then the Open Borders needs to be canceled. It's stupid to keep it otherwise. That's like congratulating them for being dicks.
Suffer Game Sicko
Dodo Tier Player
Posts: 614
Threads: 2
Joined: Oct 2005
I don't see any issue in asking CFC to not share any intel until turn 175. I think this covered by our NAP...
Mwin
Posts: 5,455
Threads: 18
Joined: Jul 2011
We won't know until after the game. I doubt they'd admit to doing this while the NAP is still active, but you'd be hard pressed to convince me that this isn't exactly what they're doing. Probably though, it doesn't matter. I'm sure Poly/CP have spies running around, in addition to having city visibility on us.
Posts: 1,075
Threads: 14
Joined: Oct 2010
We cancel the NAP and they can just claim that that means we're breaking the entire agreement and can declare war anytime they feel like it.
Posts: 5,635
Threads: 30
Joined: Apr 2009
(August 15th, 2013, 16:40)Tyrmith Wrote: We cancel the NAP and they can just claim that that means we're breaking the entire agreement and can declare war anytime they feel like it.
WHY? We're not alpha striking CFC. We don't have the men. And Civplayers just declared war.
Please explain why canceling the NAP does us a bit of good (the diplo fallout will be substantial - I don't want to risk our one ally if we can help it.)
Posts: 13,563
Threads: 49
Joined: Oct 2009
This is what Tyrmith meant:
(August 15th, 2013, 16:40)Tyrmith Wrote: If we cancel the OB, they can just claim that that means we're breaking the entire agreement and can declare war anytime they feel like it. So we shouldn't cancel the OB.
I have to run.
Posts: 5,635
Threads: 30
Joined: Apr 2009
 on me.
Posts: 13,214
Threads: 25
Joined: Oct 2010
I just want to know whether sharing intelligence with the other party's enemies is against the agreement or not. Scooter hasn't responded yet.
August 15th, 2013, 18:39
(This post was last modified: August 15th, 2013, 18:39 by scooter.)
Posts: 15,257
Threads: 112
Joined: Apr 2007
I haven't responded because I think it's silly and I'm trying to be nicer  . If someone can find something that has been violated then okay, produce it. I'm not going to go disproving the validity every crazy idea though.
|
