I have some interest in playing but am not sure I can handle another game with so many teams. Depending on how many people we have, is there any interest in a game with 4-5 teams of 2-4 people each?
|
Maybe it's the right time for a second RB Pitboss?
|
|
Timer: 18 hours or less
Leaders: Unrestricted snake -> Unrestricted w/o duplicates -> Restricted w/ duplicates Speed: Quick -> Normal -> Epic -> Marathon Difficulty: Monarch w/ tech trading, Noble w/o tech trading Huts: No Events: No Barbarians: Normal Tech: No trading -> Unrestricted -> No brokering Map: Sullla's choice Always War: No @Iamjohn - I'm not offended at giving up hosting duties, however school networks are generally very problematic. @Regoarrarr - I'm fine with 4-5 teams of 2 people since we're already in an 11 player game. However the 11 player game hasn't exactly seen the type of diplo we expected, so my vote is 4-5 teams in an unrestricted tech trading game, or 11 teams in a no tech trading game. @all - I previously offered to organize the game, but was waiting until the interest signups slowed down. I'm going to make a post and everyone's votes similar to what I did last time.
Dedicated planning thread created: http://realmsbeyond.net/forums/showthread.php?t=3634
Note there is no need to re-vote on tech trading, huts, etc. I just want to determine how many civs there are before tabulating the votes made in this thread. |
