(August 27th, 2013, 14:06)Azarius Wrote: I still don't like your view on a Serdoa lynch, but the talk on it seems to have prodded him into being more involved, which can only be a good thing.
Correction on that one: I'm not more active because people discussed lynching me, but because I have a little bit of time to be active. If I hadn't every member of the village could vote for me and I still wouldn't post.
@zak: That part was actually meant to illustrate that I really don't understand the thought process you guys followed to come to the conclusion that lynching me (of all the quiet people) would make sense. And it still doesn't for me. Even if calling a policy-lynch with ~15 hours left in D1 would make sense, calling a policy-lynch on a player that is normally very active because of the expectation of me being quieter makes no sense imo. You had several players available with as much content than me but being known for lurking. Yet you all choose to pursue me.
Again, I'm not and was not pissed that I could get lynched. But I definitely didn't and don't understand how novice, you and Jkaen landed on me of all people.
@MJW: The low post amount probably mostly stems from the fact that we have just 12 players.
(August 26th, 2013, 14:04)Qgqqqqq Wrote: @classical_hero, why do you think azza is a shady character? Is that based off something he's said here, or previous impressions at CFC?
I don't think random lynches are a good thing MJW, how do you see that (rather then the normal day 1 discussion) as being helpful to the village?
It's day one, just a random vote with a plausible explanation. Day one is just really guessing unitl w have some action on the night and we get some results.
I really don't like this. It may just be the way you've phrased it, but it sounds like you just made it up to have a plausible explanation. Do you really think he is a shady character? If so, why? If not, has he behaved differently from CFC? Have you noticed anyone behaving weirdly/suspiciously?
I know that day 1 is a pretty random shot, but the only way we can setup for better tells is if you post your views, and give us a way to judge you.
(August 27th, 2013, 10:27)classical_hero Wrote: Day one lynches are always a lottery and for the most part I am not a fan of day one lynches. I knew that from what I had read that Azza had no votes on him, so it was more than likely that he wouldn't get lynched. Day one is always the craziest day and generally just for this day no lynch is preferred.
So what are your thoughts on no lynching? Do you find anyone's reaction to it odd, given how you favor it? Why did you vote for someone who wasn't going to get lynched?
I really don't like these posts by classical_hero. The suggestion that azza was first "a shady character" and then that his vote was simply there to plant it with a plausible explanation, in other words, so he didn't have to justify it and that he deliberately voted for someone with no votes.
I don't think he's actually commented on anything from in the thread yet.
Yeah it is a policy lynch, but based off what he's said so far, and previous experience, I don't think classical_hero has any interest in contributing to the game, and only intends to avoid getting modkilled.
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
I also find Jowys interaction with zak to be quite odd, particularly considering how late in the piece he came up with it (at least 24h after the initial post, and he never commented till now, indeed he tried to shut down the conversation several times.
How long do we have till end of day?
Erebus in the Balance - a FFH Modmod based around balancing and polishing FFH for streamlined competitive play.
(August 27th, 2013, 14:40)Qgqqqqq Wrote: I also find Jowys interaction with zak to be quite odd, particularly considering how late in the piece he came up with it (at least 24h after the initial post, and he never commented till now, indeed he tried to shut down the conversation several times.
0. Player Requests: The player's requests take precedence, even if they contradict the following guidelines.
1. Balance: The map must be balanced, both in regards to land quality and availability and in regards to special civilization features. A map may be wonderfully unique and surprising, but, if it is unbalanced, the game will suffer and the player's enjoyment will not be as high as it could be.
2. Identity and Enjoyment: The map should be interesting to play at all levels, from city placement and management to the border-created interactions between civilizations, and should include varied terrain. Flavor should enhance the inherent pleasure resulting from the underlying tile arrangements. The map should not be exceedingly lush, but it is better to err on the lush side than on the poor side when placing terrain.
3. Feel (Avoiding Gimmicks): The map should not be overwhelmed or dominated by the mapmaker's flavor. Embellishment of the map through the use of special improvements, barbarian units, and abnormal terrain can enhance the identity and enjoyment of the map, but should take a backseat to the more normal aspects of the map. The game should usually not revolve around the flavor, but merely be accented by it.
4. Realism: Where possible, the terrain of the map should be realistic. Jungles on desert tiles, or even next to desert tiles, should therefore have a very specific reason for existing. Rivers should run downhill or across level ground into bodies of water. Irrigated terrain should have a higher grassland to plains ratio than dry terrain. Mountain chains should cast rain shadows. Islands, mountains, and peninsulas should follow logical plate tectonics.
Well, his grand total of 4 posts doesn't help him. His struggling of wanting to kill someone day one is understandable. But he is a vet and should have been able to get over this. And the fact that he choose me is not good ether. Still, he starts posting more in later days and has defened himself a little, unlike C.Hero.
I wish that Classical Hero would say something before deadline. As it stands now, I can only assume that his vote for Azza is actually because he didn't think Azza would get votes, which is a terrible reason. I'm not a fan of day 1 voting either, but if everyone did this it would be a completely wasted day and much easier to manipulate. If that's not his actual reason then, I'm not even sure why his vote is there? If it was a joke vote because, which it may be because of the "shady character " thing, not moving a joke vote without there being some reason you find them suspicious is just lazy.
